Cited by 146COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Disparities in excess mortality associated with COVID-19 - united states, 2020

Open access
Rossen, Lauren M., Ahmad, Farida B., Anderson, Robert N., Branum, Amy M., Du, Chengan, Krumholz, Harlan M., Li, Shu-Xia, Lin, Zhenqiu +3 more·2021·MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black (Black), non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN), and non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NH/PI) populations in the United States. These populations have experienced higher rates of infection and mortality compared with the non-Hispanic White (White) population (1-5) and greater excess mortality (i.e., the percentage increase in the number of persons who have died relative to the expected number of deaths for a given place and time) (6). A limitation of existing research on excess mortality among racial/ethnic minority groups has been the lack of adjustment for age and population change over time. This study assessed excess mortality incidence rates (IRs) (e.g., the number of excess deaths per 100,000 person-years) in the United States during December 29, 2019-January 2, 2021, by race/ethnicity and age group using data from the National Vital Statistics System. Among all assessed racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], AI/AN, Black, Hispanic, NH/PI, and White populations), excess mortality IRs were higher among persons aged ≥65 years (426.4 to 1033.5 excess deaths per 100,000 person-years) than among those aged 25-64 years (30.2 to 221.1) and those aged <25 years (-2.9 to 14.1). Among persons aged <65 years, Black and AI/AN populations had the highest excess mortality IRs. Among adults aged ≥65 years, Black and Hispanic persons experienced the highest excess mortality IRs of >1,000 excess deaths per 100,000 person-years. These findings could help guide more tailored public health messaging and mitigation efforts to reduce disparities in mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States,* by identifying the racial/ethnic groups and age groups with the highest excess mortality rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7033a2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COVID-19 infections and pandemic-related mortality are higher in African American than White adults in all age groups.

    “It is well documented that COVID-19 infections and pandemic-related mortality are higher in African American than White adults in all age groups (Rossen et al., 2021).”

    From Young Adult Adaptability to the Social Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Protective Role of Friendships (2022) · cites this paper as Rossen et al., 2021

    The paper’s main text reports higher excess mortality rates for Black than White people in each age group examined, and its introduction states that Black populations had higher infection rates than White populations overall. It does not establish higher infection rates for Black adults in every age group. The cited passages do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior work has shown important disparities in COVID-19 impact by race/ethnicity and economic status in the US and abroad.

    “Prior work has shown important disparities in COVID-19 impact by race/ethnicity and economic status (Mena et al., 2021; Rossen, 2021) in the US and abroad.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rossen, L. M., Ahmad, F. B., Anderson, R. N., Branum, A. M., Du, C., Krumholz, H. M., Li, S.-X., Lin, Z., Marshall, A., Sutton, P. D., & Faust, J. S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Rossen, Lauren M.
Venue
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2021-08-20
Volume
70
Issue
33
Pages
1114-1119
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3195344687
Cited by
146
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 11
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, excess mortality, racial and ethnic disparities, Hispanic population, Black population, older adults, age-adjusted mortality rates, United States
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Aged, Ethnicity, Humans, Middle Aged, Mortality, United States, Age Distribution, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review