Cited by 847Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningMotor Control and Adaptation

Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrations

Open access
Rajeswaran, Aravind, Kumar, Vikash, Gupta, Abhishek, Vezzani, Giulia, Schulman, John, Todorov, Emanuel, Levine, Sergey·2018·Robotics: Science and Systems XIV

Abstract

Dexterous multi-fingered hands are extremely versatile and provide a generic way to perform a multitude of tasks in human-centric environments.However, effectively controlling them remains challenging due to their high dimensionality and large number of potential contacts.Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) provides a model-agnostic approach to control complex dynamical systems, but has not been shown to scale to highdimensional dexterous manipulation.Furthermore, deployment of DRL on physical systems remains challenging due to sample inefficiency.Consequently, the success of DRL in robotics has thus far been limited to simpler manipulators and tasks.In this work, we show that model-free DRL can effectively scale up to complex manipulation tasks with a high-dimensional 24-DoF hand, and solve them from scratch in simulated experiments.Furthermore, with the use of a small number of human demonstrations, the sample complexity can be significantly reduced, which enables learning with sample sizes equivalent to a few hours of robot experience.The use of demonstrations result in policies that exhibit very natural movements and, surprisingly, are also substantially more robust.We demonstrate successful policies for object relocation, in-hand manipulation, tool use, and door opening, which are shown in the supplementary video.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15607/rss.2018.xiv.049

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robots still struggle to solve high-level tasks such as locomotion, autonomous driving and dexterous manipulation, even though low-level controllers and motion planning algorithms are robust enough to drive joints and end-effectors to desired configurations.

    “Even though low-level controllers and motion planning algorithms are robust enough to drive the joints and end-effectors to reach their desired configuration, robots still struggle to solve high-level tasks, such as locomotion [3], autonomous driving [4] and dexterous manipulation [5].”

    From Data-Driven Robotic Manipulation of Cloth-like Deformable Objects: The Present, Challenges and Future Prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adversarial-based methods build a domain classifier to distinguish whether features come from source or target domain, and after training the extractor can produce invariant features from both domains.

    “Adversarial-based methods build a domain classifier to distinguish whether the features come from source domain or target domain. After being trained, the extractor could produce invariant feature from both source domain and target domain [68], [69], [70].”

    From Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Related Work and Demo Augmented Policy Gradient sections discuss imitation learning and reinforcement learning for dexterous manipulation. A search for domain classifiers, source and target domains, and invariant features found no passage addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. J. A. Bagnell and J. G. Schneider. Covariant policy search. In IJCAI, 2003.
  2. I. Mordatch, Z. Popović, and E. Todorov. Contact-invariant optimization for hand manipulation. In ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation, pages 137-144. Eurographics Association, 2012.
  3. X. B. Peng, P. Abbeel, S. Levine, and M. van de Panne. Deepmimic: Example-guided deep reinforcement learning of physics-based character skills. In ACM SIGGRAPH, 2018.
  4. J. Schulman, S. Levine, P. Moritz, M. Jordan, and P. Abbeel. Trust region policy optimization. In ICML, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajeswaran, A., Kumar, V., Gupta, A., Vezzani, G., Schulman, J., Todorov, E., & Levine, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • OpenAI (United States) (US)
Venue
Robotics: Science and Systems XIV
Published
2018-06-26
OpenAlex
W2757631751
Cited by
847
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
34.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
dexterous manipulation, multi-fingered hand, deep reinforcement learning, imitation learning, human demonstrations, sample efficiency, high-dimensional control, in-hand manipulation, tool use, door opening, object relocation, robotic grasping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review