PreprintCited by 22Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Data

Open access
Lynch, Corey, Sermanet, Pierre·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Natural language is perhaps the most flexible and intuitive way for humans to communicate tasks to a robot. Prior work in imitation learning typically requires each task be specified with a task id or goal image -- something that is often impractical in open-world environments. On the other hand, previous approaches in instruction following allow agent behavior to be guided by language, but typically assume structure in the observations, actuators, or language that limit their applicability to complex settings like robotics. In this work, we present a method for incorporating free-form natural language conditioning into imitation learning. Our approach learns perception from pixels, natural language understanding, and multitask continuous control end-to-end as a single neural network. Unlike prior work in imitation learning, our method is able to incorporate unlabeled and unstructured demonstration data (i.e. no task or language labels). We show this dramatically improves language conditioned performance, while reducing the cost of language annotation to less than 1% of total data. At test time, a single language conditioned visuomotor policy trained with our method can perform a wide variety of robotic manipulation skills in a 3D environment, specified only with natural language descriptions of each task (e.g. "open the drawer...now pick up the block...now press the green button..."). To scale up the number of instructions an agent can follow, we propose combining text conditioned policies with large pretrained neural language models. We find this allows a policy to be robust to many out-of-distribution synonym instructions, without requiring new demonstrations. See videos of a human typing live text commands to our agent at language-play.github.io

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.07648

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The original Language Table trajectories have short horizons (e.g., only moving one block).

    “The original trajectories have short horizons (e.g., only moving one block).”

    From Learning Interactive Real-World Simulators (2023) · cites this paper as Lynch & Sermanet, 2020

    The Experiments section (p. 5) describes trajectories in a simulated 3D Playroom, and Appendix O (p. 14) describes long-horizon task sequences. Our copy does not identify an original Language Table dataset or say its trajectories have short horizons involving only one block (searched: “Language Table,” “short horizon,” and “only moving one block”). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [2][2] Marcin Andrychowicz, Filip Wolski, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Rachel Fong, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Josh Tobin, OpenAI Pieter Abbeel, and Wojciech Zaremba. Hindsight experience replay. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 5048-5058, 2017. -
  2. [13][13] Shixiang Gu, Ethan Holly, Timothy Lillicrap, and Sergey Levine. Deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation with asynchronous offpolicy updates. In 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) , pages 3389-3396. IEEE, 2017. -
  3. [28][28] Ashvin Nair, Shikhar Bahl, Alexander Khazatsky, Vitchyr Pong, Glen Berseth, and Sergey Levine. Contextual imagined goals for selfsupervised robotic learning. In Conference on Robot Learning , pages 530-539. PMLR, 2020. -
  4. [32][32] Junhyuk Oh, Satinder Singh, Honglak Lee, and Pushmeet Kohli. Zeroshot task generalization with multi-task deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine LearningVolume 70 , pages 2661-2670. JMLR. org, 2017. -
  5. [33][33] Sherjil Ozair, Corey Lynch, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Van den Oord, Sergey Levine, and Pierre Sermanet. Wasserstein dependency measure for representation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 15578-15588, 2019. -
  6. [36][36] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog , 1(8):9, 2019. -
  7. [41][41] Pierre Sermanet, Corey Lynch, Yevgen Chebotar, Jasmine Hsu, Eric Jang, Stefan Schaal, and Sergey Levine. Time-contrastive networks: Selfsupervised learning from video. Proceedings of International Conference in Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1704.06888. -
  8. [43][43] Avi Singh, Eric Jang, Alexander Irpan, Daniel Kappler, Murtaza Dalal, Sergey Levine, Mohi Khansari, and Chelsea Finn. Scalable multitask imitation learning with autonomous improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02636 , 2020. - · arXiv
  9. [54][54] Victor Zhong, Tim Rockt¨ aschel, and Edward Grefenstette. Rtfm: Generalising to novel environment dynamics via reading. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.08210 , 2019. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, C., & Sermanet, P.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178987284
Cited by
18
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
robotic manipulation, visuomotor control, end-to-end learning, unstructured data, pre-trained language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review