The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Optimization and Control
Abstract
We study how protocol design for various functionalities within a communication network architecture can be viewed as a distributed resource allocation problem. This involves understanding what resources are, how to allocate them fairly, and perhaps most importantly, how to achieve this goal in a distributed and stable fashion. We start with ideas of a centralized optimization framework and show how congestion control, routing and scheduling in wired and wireless networks can be thought of as fair resource allocation. We then move to the study of controllers that allow a decentralized solution of this problem. These controllers are the analytical equivalent of protocols in use on the Internet today, and we describe existing protocols as realizations of such controllers. The Internet is a dynamic system with feedback delays and flows that arrive and depart, which means that stability of the system cannot be taken for granted. We show how to incorporate stability into protocols, and thus, prevent undesirable network behavior. Finally, we consider a futuristic scenario where users are aware of the effects of their actions and try to game the system. We will see that the optimization framework is remarkably robust even to such gaming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Bertsekas, D. P. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600425 · Cited by 11,726
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Nash, J. F. (1950) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907266 · Cited by 7,840
COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
Vickrey, W. (1961) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x · Cited by 7,722
Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance
Floyd, S., & Jacobson, V. (1993) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.251892 · Cited by 6,290
Bertsekas, D. P., & Gallager, R. G. (1987) · Cited by 5,561
Congestion avoidance and control
Jacobson, V. (1995) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/205447.205462 · Cited by 5,301
Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability
Kelly, F. P., Maulloo, A. K., & Tan, D. K. H. (1998) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600523 · Cited by 5,021
Cited by
Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications
(2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804458 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Shakkottai, S., & Srikant, R.
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends® in Networking
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-379
- ISSN
- 1554-057X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0588
- OpenAlex
- W2058677708
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 43.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Optimization and Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1561/1300000007
- The paper
- Shakkottai, S., & Srikant, R. (2007). Network Optimization and Control. Foundations and Trends® in Networking. https://doi.org/10.1561/1300000007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.