The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Abstract
An important part of our information-gathering behavior has always been to find out what other people think. With the growing availability and popularity of opinion-rich resources such as online review sites and personal blogs, new opportunities and challenges arise as people can, and do, actively use information technologies to seek out and understand the opinions of others. The sudden eruption of activity in the area of opinion mining and sentiment analysis, which deals with the computational treatment of opinion, sentiment, and subjectivity in text, has thus occurred at least in part as a direct response to the surge of interest in new systems that deal directly with opinions as a first-class object. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis covers techniques and approaches that promise to directly enable opinion-oriented information-seeking systems. The focus is on methods that seek to address the new challenges raised by sentiment-aware applications, as compared to those that are already present in more traditional fact-based analysis. The survey includes an enumeration of the various applications, a look at general challenges and discusses categorization, extraction and summarization. Finally, it moves beyond just the technical issues, devoting significant attention to the broader implications that the development of opinion-oriented information-access services have: questions of privacy, vulnerability to manipulation, and whether or not reviews can have measurable economic impact. To facilitate future work, a discussion of available resources, benchmark datasets, and evaluation campaigns is also provided. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis is the first such comprehensive survey of this vibrant and important research area and will be of interest to anyone with an interest in opinion-oriented information-seeking systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance
Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260996 · Cited by 3,653
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery · doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277 · Cited by 2,619
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190
Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08 · doi:10.1145/1341531.1341560 · Cited by 1,542
Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data
LAVER, M., BENOIT, K., & GARRY, J. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000698 · Cited by 1,377
The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2 · Cited by 1,118
Cited by
Items 101–113 of 113
Global Aggregations of Local Explanations for Black Box models
van der Linden, I., Haned, H., & Kanoulas, E. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.03039 · Cited by 35
Sentiment analysis on evolving social streams: how self-report imbalances can help
Guerra, P. C., Meira, W., & Cardie, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/2556195.2556261 · Cited by 35
It Takes Two to Lie: One to Lie, and One to Listen
Peskov, D., Cheng, B., Elgohary, A., Barrow, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Boyd-Graber, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.353 · Cited by 30
No Homo: Gendered Dimensions of Homophobic Epithets Online
Pascoe, C. J., & Diefendorf, S. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0926-4 · Cited by 29
Lappeman, J., Patel, M., & Appalraju, R. (2018) · Communicatio · doi:10.1080/02500167.2018.1478866 · Cited by 25
Brassey, J., Price, C., Edwards, J., Zlabinger, M., Bampoulidis, A., & Hanbury, A. (2021) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111126 · Cited by 22
Wijnhoven, F., & Bloemen, O. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.12.005 · Cited by 21
Positivity Bias in Customer Satisfaction Ratings
Park, K., Cha, M., & Rhim, E. (2018) · Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3184558.3186579 · Cited by 19
Abu-Jeyyab, M., Alrosan, S., & Alkhawaldeh, I. (2023) · High Yield Medical Reviews · doi:10.59707/hymrfbya5348 · Cited by 17
On Assessing the Performance of LLMs for Target-Level Sentiment Analysis in Financial News Headlines
Muhammad, I., & Rospocher, M. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18010046 · Cited by 14
Correlating Languages and Sentiment Analysis on the Basis of Text-based Reviews
García-Pablos, A., Duca, A. L., Cuadros, M., Linaza, M. T., & Marchetti, A. (2016) · Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_41 · Cited by 14
Venkit, P. N., & Wilson, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13259 · Cited by 14
Explore the Effects of Emoticons on Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Wegrzyn-Wolska, K., Bougueroua, L., Yu, H., & Zhong, J. (2016) · Computer Science & Information Technology ( CS & IT ) · doi:10.5121/csit.2016.61006 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, B., & Lee, L.
- Venue
- now publishers, Inc. eBooks
- Publisher
- now Publishers Inc
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W2097726431
- Cited by
- 6,720
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 88.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.