The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Optimal Transport
Abstract
The goal of Optimal Transport (OT) is to define geometric tools that are useful to compare probability distributions. Their use dates back to 1781. Recent years have witnessed a new revolution in the spread of OT, thanks to the emergence of approximate solvers that can scale to sizes and dimensions that are relevant to data sciences. Thanks to this newfound scalability, OT is being increasingly used to unlock various problems in imaging sciences (such as color or texture processing), computer vision and graphics (for shape manipulation) or machine learning (for regression, classification and density fitting). This monograph reviews OT with a bias toward numerical methods and their applications in data sciences, and sheds lights on the theoretical properties of OT that make it particularly useful for some of these applications. Computational Optimal Transport presents an overview of the main theoretical insights that support the practical effectiveness of OT before explaining how to turn these insights into fast computational schemes. Written for readers at all levels, the authors provide descriptions of foundational theory at two-levels. Generally accessible to all readers, more advanced readers can read the specially identified more general mathematical expositions of optimal transport tailored for discrete measures. Furthermore, several chapters deal with the interplay between continuous and discrete measures, and are thus targeting a more mathematically-inclined audience. This monograph will be a valuable reference for researchers and students wishing to get a thorough understanding of Computational Optimal Transport, a mathematical gem at the interface of probability, analysis and optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
The Hungarian method for the assignment problem
Kuhn, H. W. (1955) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800020109 · Cited by 13,120
Boyd, S. (2010) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601984616 · Cited by 12,677
Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond
Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4175.001.0001 · Cited by 11,703
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
(2017) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 6,382
Cited by
UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learning
Chen, Y.-C., Li, L., Yu, L., El Kholy, A., Ahmed, F., Gan, Z., Cheng, Y., & Liu, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58577-8_7 · Cited by 2,055
Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registration
Wang, Y., & Solomon, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00362 · Cited by 1,112
Learning to Generate Novel Domains for Domain Generalization
Zhou, K., Yang, Y., Hospedales, T., & Xiang, T. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58517-4_33 · Cited by 382
The Born supremacy: quantum advantage and training of an Ising Born machine
Coyle, B., Mills, D., Danos, V., & Kashefi, E. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00288-9 · Cited by 155
JointGT: Graph-Text Joint Representation Learning for Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs
Ke, P., Ji, H., Ran, Y., Cui, X., Wang, L., Song, L., Zhu, X., & Huang, M. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.223 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Peyré, G., & Cuturi, M.
- Venue
- now publishers, Inc. eBooks
- Publisher
- now Publishers Inc
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W2793477525
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 210
- FWCI
- 77.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Optimal Transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1561/9781680835519
- The paper
- Peyré, G., & Cuturi, M. (2019). Computational Optimal Transport. now publishers, Inc. eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680835519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.