The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrophilic Cyanine Dyes as Contrast Agents for Near-infrared Tumor Imaging: Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and Spectroscopic In vivo Characterization ¶
Abstract
We have synthesized a group of glucamine and gluosamine-substituted cyanine dyes structurally related to indocyanine green (ICG) and have characterized these compounds with regard to their potential as contrast agents for biomedical optical imaging. The compounds reported herein exhibit increased hydrophilicity and less plasma protein binding (< 50%), and are thus expected to have different pharmacokinetic properties compared with ICG. Furthermore, we measured enhanced fluorescence quantum yields (7-15%) in a physiological environment with respect to ICG. For the derivative with the highest hydrophilicity (5a) the efflux from tumor and normal tissue was monitored by intensity-modulated diffuse optical spectroscopy after intravenous injection into tumor-bearing rats. In comparison with ICG, 5a exhibited a considerably enhanced tissue-efflux half-life (73 min versus less than 10 min for ICG in tumor tissue), a two-fold higher initial tissue absorption coefficient compared to ICG, and finally, it generated an elevated tumor-to-tissue concentration gradient up to 1 h after injection. In conclusion, compounds such as 5a are promising contrast agents for optical imaging, and could facilitate highly sensitive and specific detection of breast cancer or other malignancies by utilizing mechanisms similar to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shedding light onto live molecular targets
Weissleder, R., & Ntziachristos, V. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0103-123 · Cited by 1,909
Self-citationAdvances in In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Gene Expression
Contag, C. H., & Bachmann, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.111901.093336 · Cited by 870
Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis
Cai, W., & Chen, X. (2008) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.045922 · Cited by 494
Shi, C., Wu, J. B., & Pan, D. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.21.5.050901 · Cited by 286
Photophysical Properties of Indocyanine Green in the Shortwave Infrared Region
Cosco, E. D., Lim, I., & Sletten, E. M. (2021) · ChemPhotoChem · doi:10.1002/cptc.202100045 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Licha, K., Riefke, B., Ntziachristos, V., Becker, A., Chance, B., & Semmler, W.
- Venue
- Photochemistry and Photobiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Photobiology
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 392-398
- ISSN
- 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1947700761
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrophilic Cyanine Dyes as Contrast Agents for Near-infrared Tumor Imaging: Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and Spectroscopic In vivo Characterization ¶. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1562/0031-8655(2000)0720392hcdaca2.0.co2
- The paper
- Licha, K., Riefke, B., Ntziachristos, V., Becker, A., Chance, B., & Semmler, W. (2007). Hydrophilic Cyanine Dyes as Contrast Agents for Near-infrared Tumor Imaging: Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and Spectroscopic In vivo Characterization ¶. Photochemistry and Photobiology. https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2000)0720392hcdaca2.0.co2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.