Cited by 7Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Randomized Controlled Trials in Implant Dentistry: Assessment of the Last 20 Years of Contribution and Research Network Analysis

Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael, Marchini, Leonardo, Spazzin, Aloísio O., Santos, Mateus B. F. dos·2019·Journal of Oral Implantology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding implant-supported single tooth or fixed partial dentures. We performed searches (PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science) to identify all RCTs published from 1996 to 2016 and assessed publication details, study characteristics, international collaboration networks, and characteristics related to the implant-supported treatment. Two reviewers independently screened the titles/abstracts and selected full texts. A total of 122 RCTs were included, and most of the authors were from Europe (72%). Most trials did not report a trial registering number (89.9%) or sample size calculation (58.2%). The use of the CONSORT Statement increased over the past 9 years. Trials were mostly conducted at universities (54.9%), and only 13.1% compared 2 or more implant brands. Loading protocol was the most prevalent main comparison among the included studies, and most of the RCTs did not clearly report whether they excluded patients with known risk factors. The studies reviewed here presented different methodological and publication characteristics, and many did not show aspects aligned with current research practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-18-00276

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarkis-Onofre, R., Marchini, L., Spazzin, A. O., & Santos, M. B. F. D.
Affiliations
  • Graduate Program in Dentistry, IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Atitus Educação (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
Venue
Journal of Oral Implantology
Published
2019-08
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
327-333
ISSN
  • 0160-6972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1336
OpenAlex
W2950622201
Cited by
7
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Implantology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
implant-supported fixed partial dentures, randomized controlled trials, research collaboration networks, publication characteristics, CONSORT statement, clinical trial registration, sample size determination, loading protocols, methodological quality
MeSH terms
Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dentistry, Humans, Dental Implants, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review