Cited by 15Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorationsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution of Tooth-Implant and Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis Study

Naguib, Ghada H., Hashem, Abou Bakr H., Natto, Zuhair S., Abougazia, Ahmed O., Mously, Hisham A., Hamed, Mohamed T.·2023·Journal of Oral Implantology

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the implant diameter and length on force dissemination of tooth-implant and implant retained fixed restorations. A finite analysis model was used via a 3D simulation of a unilateral mandibular Kennedy Class I arch. Through thresholding the resultant assembly, a region of interest was selected from the computed tomography (CT) scan. Details of the diameter (D) and length (L) of implant were introduced. Ds used were 3.7, 4.7, and 5.7, while Ls used were 10, 11.5, and 13. The constant was the use of rigid connectors in both designs (implant-implant and implant-tooth fixed partial dentures [FPDs]) and the mesial implant (D 3.7 and L 11.5). Stress in cancellous bone around mesial abutment, which is the second premolar in tooth-implant FPD and mesial implant in the implant-implant FPD, revealed that the stress was significantly lower in tooth-implant FPD when compared with implant-implant FPD (21.1 ± 0.00 vs 46.1 ± 0.00, P < .001). Stress distribution in the bone around any implant depends on several factors such as diameter, length, and tooth-implant vs implant-implant support. The implant diameter was more significant for improved stress distribution than implant length. A moderate increase in the length of the implant consequently reduced stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-21-00023

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preoperative orthodontic treatment can optimize interproximal spacing, align residual teeth, and establish and maintain normal maxillofacial horizontal and vertical relationships.

    “Evidence suggests that preoperative orthodontic treatment can optimize interproximal spacing, align residual teeth, and establish and maintain normal maxillofacial horizontal and vertical relationships [13–15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naguib, G. H., Hashem, A. B. H., Natto, Z. S., Abougazia, A. O., Mously, H. A., & Hamed, M. T.
Affiliations
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Research Institute of Ophthalmology (EG)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Private Practice, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Cairo University (EG)
Venue
Journal of Oral Implantology
Published
2023-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
46-54
ISSN
  • 0160-6972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1336
OpenAlex
W4200137742
Cited by
15
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Implantology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
dental implants, implant length, implant diameter, stress distribution, cancellous bone stress, rigid connectors
MeSH terms
Dental Stress Analysis, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Stress, Mechanical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Finite Element Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review