Cited by 39Hydrological Forecasting Using AIGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryWater resources management and optimization

Modeling of groundwater level using artificial intelligence techniques: a case study of Reyhanli region in Turkey

Open access
DEMIRCI, M, ÜNEŞ, F, KÖRLÜ, S·2019·Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

Abstract

Determination of the change in groundwater level in terms of planning and managing resources is important.In this study, the groundwater level of Reyhanlı region in Turkey was predicted using multi-linear regression (MLR), adaptive neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), Radial basis neural network (RBNN), support vector machines with radial basis functions (SVM-RBF) and support vector machines with poly kernels (SVM-PK) methods.Models were carried out using 192 data of monthly ground water level, monthly total precipitation and monthly average temperature values measured for 16 years between 2000 and 2015.Comparisons revealed that the SVM-RBF and SVM-PK models had the most accuracy in the groundwater level prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15666/aeer/1702_26512663

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Scholkopf, B., Smola, A. J. (2002): Learning with Kernels. -MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  2. Taşar, B., Üneş, F., Demirci. M., Kaya, Y. Z. (2018): Forecasting of daily evaporation amounts using artificial neural networks. -Journal of Dicle University Engineering 9(1): 543-551.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DEMIRCI, M., ÜNEŞ, F., & KÖRLÜ, S.
Affiliations
İskenderun Technical University (TR)
Venue
Applied Ecology and Environmental Research
Publisher
ALOKI Ltd
Published
2019
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
2651-2663
ISSN
  • 1589-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1785-0037
OpenAlex
W2922089711
Cited by
39
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Applied Ecology and Environmental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
groundwater level prediction, artificial intelligence, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, radial basis function neural network, support vector machine, multi-linear regression, precipitation, air temperature, groundwater management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review