Cited by 239Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine Biology

The Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System: A New Tool

McMichael, Geoffrey A., Eppard, M. Brad, Carlson, Thomas J., Carter, Jessica A., Ebberts, Blaine D., Brown, Richard S., Weiland, Mark, Ploskey, Gene R. +2 more·2010·Fisheries

Abstract

Limitations of biotelemetry technology available in 2001 prompted the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District to develop a new acoustic telemetry system to monitor survival of juvenile salmonids through the Columbia River to the Pacific Ocean. Eight years later, the Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System (JSATS) consists of microacoustic transmitters (12 mm long, 0.43 g weight in air), autonomous and cabled receiving systems, and data management and processing applications. Transmitter pulse rate can be user-defined and as configured for this case study was set at 5 seconds, with an estimated tag life of 30 days and detection range of 300 m. Before JSATS development, no technology existed to study movement and survival of fish smaller than 10 g migrating long distances from freshwater and into saltwater. In a 2008 study comparing detection probabilities, travel times, and survival of 4,140 JSATS-tagged and 48,433 passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagged yearling Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; mean fork length 133.9 and 135.3 mm, for JSATS and PIT-tagged fish, respectively) migrating the Snake and Columbia rivers to the Pacific, the JSATS provided survival estimates at more locations with greater precision, using less than one-tenth as many tagged fish as the traditional PIT-tag system. While designed to be optimized for juvenile salmonid survival assessment in the Columbia River basin, JSATS technology may be used in a variety of environments. Informat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1577/1548-8446-35.1.9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMichael, G. A., Eppard, M. B., Carlson, T. J., Carter, J. A., Ebberts, B. D., Brown, R. S., Weiland, M., Ploskey, G. R., Harnish, R. A., & Deng, Z. D.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • United States Army Corps of Engineers (US)
Corresponding author
McMichael, Geoffrey A.
Venue
Fisheries
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
9-22
ISSN
  • 0363-2415 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8446
OpenAlex
W2077317482
Cited by
239
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
18.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
acoustic telemetry, juvenile salmonids, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, fish survival, fish migration, Snake River, Columbia River, detection probability, travel time, fish movement monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review