The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Value of Producing Food, Energy, and Ecosystem Services within an Agro-Ecosystem
Abstract
Agricultural ecosystems produce food, fiber, and non-marketed ecosystem services (ES). Agriculture also typically involves high negative external costs associated with, for example, fossil fuel use. We estimated, via field-scale ecological monitoring and economic value-transfer methods, the market and nonmarket ES value of a combined food and energy (CFE) agro-ecosystem that simultaneously produces food, fodder, and bioenergy. Such novel CFE agro-ecosystems can provide a significantly increased net crop, energy, and nonmarketed ES compared with conventional agriculture, and require markedly less fossil-based inputs. Extrapolated to the European scale, the value of nonmarket ES from the CFE system exceeds current European farm subsidy payments. Such integrated food and bioenergy systems can thus provide environmental value for money for European Union farming and nonfarming communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Self-citationGlobal Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
Tilman, D., Hill, J., & Lehman, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133306 · Cited by 1,813
Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket
Pretty, J. N., Ball, A. S., Lang, T., & Morison, J. I. L. (2005) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.02.001 · Cited by 516
Helling, B., Pfeiff, G., & Larink, O. (1998) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(97)00065-6 · Cited by 83
Cited by
Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century
Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.221 · Cited by 1,765
Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale
Crowder, D. W., & Reganold, J. P. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423674112 · Cited by 518
Economic Value of Biological Control in Integrated Pest Management of Managed Plant Systems
Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Frisvold, G. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005 · Cited by 406
Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Reyes-García, V. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.011 · Cited by 282
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review
Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12067 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L., & Wratten, S.
- Venue
- AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
- Publisher
- Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 186-193
- ISSN
- 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2204196717
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Value of Producing Food, Energy, and Ecosystem Services within an Agro-Ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186
- The paper
- Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L., & Wratten, S. (2009). The Value of Producing Food, Energy, and Ecosystem Services within an Agro-Ecosystem. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
