Cited by 271Bioenergy crop production and managementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review

Open access
Immerzeel, DESIRÉE J., Verweij, PITA A., van der Hilst, FLOOR, Faaij, ANDRÉ P. C.·2014·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

The use of biomass as feedstock for energy is often associated with increased claims on land, competition with food production and impacts on other ecosystem services. Studies on sustainability aspects of bioenergy production often indicate biodiversity as a key concern. This article presents a first comprehensive review of published impacts of bioenergy crop production on biodiversity, evaluates the drivers and pressures of biodiversity change and summarizes current trends and impacts. The review provides insight into the types of biodiversity indicators applied under a range of conditions and the mitigating measures proposed to minimize negative impacts or realize biodiversity benefits. The 53 selected publications give diverse results that are explained by the various spatial scales, production systems and regions, time horizons, methodologies and biodiversity indicators used. Reported impacts depend on initial land use and are mostly negative, especially in tropical regions. The impacts of second generation bioenergy crops tend to be less negative than first generation ones, and are in some cases positive (at the field level), in particular in temperate regions. Land‐use change appears as the key driver of biodiversity change, whereas the associated habitat loss, alterations in species richness and abundance are the main impacts addressed. Such changes are often paired with the (initiation of a) process of biological homogenization. The article confirms that concerns about the expansion of bioenergy crop production not only relate to the direct effects on biodiversity by replacing natural vegetation, but increasingly to indirect effects as well. These effects have, however, shown to be difficult to quantify. At the same time, the land sparing vs. land sharing debate receives growing attention, whereas little evidence exists in bioenergy literature on the impacts of large‐scale application of these strategies on (agro)biodiversity. Following the findings of the review, the article finally provides recommendations for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12067

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in otherwise large cropland monocultures.

    “Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in what are otherwise large cropland monocultures (109).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [109]

  • The impact of biofuel production on biodiversity depends on the initial land use condition, the type of bioenergy production system, and the landscape configuration.

    “The impact of biofuel production on biodiversity depends on the initial land use condition, the type of bioenergy production system, and the landscape configuration”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Immerzeel et al. 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Synthesis of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  2. Sala OE, Sax D, Leslie H (2009) Biodiversity consequences of biofuel production. In: Biofuels, Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use. Pro- ceedings of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) Interna- tional Biofuels Project Rapid Assessment (eds Howarth RW, Bringezu S), pp. 127-137. 22-25 September 2008, Gummersbach, Germany. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F., & Faaij, A. P. C.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Group Energy & Resources Faculty of Geosciences Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Budapestlaan 6 Utrecht 3584 CD The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Immerzeel, DESIRÉE J.
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
183-209
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2125916593
Cited by
271
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
40.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
energy crops, biodiversity impacts, land use change, habitat loss, species richness, biotic homogenization, indirect land use change, land sparing, land sharing, agrobiodiversity, biodiversity indicators, tropical regions, temperate regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review