Cited by 48Literacy and Educational PracticesEducational Philosophies and PedagogiesLinguistics and Education Research

Reader-Response Theory and Literature Discussions: a Springboard for Exploring Literary Texts

Open access
Mart, Cagri·2019·The New Educational Review

Abstract

Reader-response theory is based on the assumption that a literary work takes place in the mutual relationship between the reader and the text.According to this theory, the meaning is constructed through a transaction between the reader and the text within a particular context.Readers assume multiple roles when responding to a variety of forms of literature.Th e process of developing responses facilitates active and meaningful reading and increases emotional and intellectual participation in the text, which ultimately provides learners with better comprehension and awareness of the text.Th e potential value of classroom discussions helps learners to express their emotional reactions, to elicit their responses, to nourish their perspectives for furthering depth of their interpretation, to corroborate their opinions and share their responses for building a social relationship.It is crucial that learners are directed to perform more adequately in response to texts and actively engage in dialogues to pose literal and inferential questions, to explore a range of possible meanings and to foster cognitive development and comprehension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15804/tner.19.56.2.06

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mart, C.
Venue
The New Educational Review
Published
2019-06-30
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
78-87
ISSN
1732-6729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3142386094
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The New Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
reader-response criticism, literary conversation, classroom discussion, reader-text relationship, meaning-making, active reading, inferential questions, literary interpretation, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review