Reader-Response Theory and Literature Discussions: a Springboard for Exploring Literary Texts
Open accessAbstract
Reader-response theory is based on the assumption that a literary work takes place in the mutual relationship between the reader and the text.According to this theory, the meaning is constructed through a transaction between the reader and the text within a particular context.Readers assume multiple roles when responding to a variety of forms of literature.Th e process of developing responses facilitates active and meaningful reading and increases emotional and intellectual participation in the text, which ultimately provides learners with better comprehension and awareness of the text.Th e potential value of classroom discussions helps learners to express their emotional reactions, to elicit their responses, to nourish their perspectives for furthering depth of their interpretation, to corroborate their opinions and share their responses for building a social relationship.It is crucial that learners are directed to perform more adequately in response to texts and actively engage in dialogues to pose literal and inferential questions, to explore a range of possible meanings and to foster cognitive development and comprehension.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students' efferent stance towards the text can enable them to acquire and retrieve particular information from a text.
“Students' efferent stance towards the text can enable them to acquire and retrieve particular information from a text (Mart 2019)”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Mart 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts
Zhong, Y., Davies, M., & Wilson, A. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12816 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Chapter 1: Problem-based learning: A 21st-century teaching and learning strategy
Research Unit Self-Directed Learning, F. O. E., Golightly, A., Sebatana, M. J., & School of Mathematics, S. A. T. E. (2023) · NWU Self-Directed Learning Series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk409.01 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mart, C.
- Venue
- The New Educational Review
- Publisher
- Wydawnictwo Adam Marszalek
- Published
- 2019-06-30
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 78-87
- ISSN
- 1732-6729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3142386094
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The New Educational Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Keywords
- reader-response criticism, literary conversation, classroom discussion, reader-text relationship, meaning-making, active reading, inferential questions, literary interpretation, cognitive development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review