Cited by 326Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for themanagement of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk

Open access
Mach, Francois, Baigent, Colin, Catapano, Alberico L., Koskinas, Konstantinos C., Casula, Manuela, Badimon, Lina, Chapman, M. John, De Backer, Guy G. +13 more·2020·Russian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3826

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several previous meta-analyses have investigated the role of SFA restriction for CVD prevention, and these have been cited as evidence supporting the recommendation of SFA restriction by the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society.

    “Several previous meta-analysis have investigated the role of SFA restriction for CVD prevention (26), (27), (28), and these have been cited as evidence supporting the recommendation of SFA restriction by the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (29).”

    From Saturated Fat Restriction for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mach, F., Baigent, C., Catapano, A. L., Koskinas, K. C., Casula, M., Badimon, L., Chapman, M. J., De Backer, G. G., Delgado, V., Ference, B. A., Graham, I. M., Halliday, A., Landmesser, U., Mihaylova, B., Pedersen, T. R., Riccardi, G., Richter, D. J., Sabatine, M. S., Taskinen, M.-R., Tokgozoglu, L., & Wiklund, O.
Affiliations
  • Geneva University Hospital
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
3826
ISSN
  • 1560-4071 (ISSN-L)
  • 2618-7620
OpenAlex
W3034853614
Cited by
325
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8
FWCI
48.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Russian Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Russian Cardiology Journal (Russian Cardiology Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
dyslipidemia, lipid modification, cardiovascular risk reduction, dyslipidemia management, ESC/EAS guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review