Cited by 513T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmune responses and vaccinationsImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Immune responses in neonates

Open access
Basha, Saleem, Surendran, Naveen, Pichichero, Michael·2014·Expert Review of Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Neonates have little immunological memory and a developing immune system, which increases their vulnerability to infectious agents. Recent advances in the understanding of neonatal immunity indicate that both innate and adaptive responses are dependent on precursor frequency of lymphocytes, antigenic dose and mode of exposure. Studies in neonatal mouse models and human umbilical cord blood cells demonstrate the capability of neonatal immune cells to produce immune responses similar to adults in some aspects but not others. This review focuses mainly on the developmental and functional mechanisms of the human neonatal immune system. In particular, the mechanism of innate and adaptive immunity and the role of neutrophils, antigen presenting cells, differences in subclasses of T lymphocytes (Th1, Th2, Tregs) and B cells are discussed. In addition, we have included the recent developments in the neonatal mouse immune system. Understanding neonatal immunity is essential to development of therapeutic vaccines to combat newly emerging infectious agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/1744666x.2014.942288

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basha, S., Surendran, N., & Pichichero, M.
Affiliations
Rochester General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Pichichero, Michael
Venue
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
Published
2014-08-04
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1171-1184
ISSN
  • 1744-666X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8409
OpenAlex
W2090477263
Cited by
513
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R0108671)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC008671)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
neonatal immunity, immune system development, innate immunity, adaptive immunity, antigen dose, umbilical cord blood, neutrophils, antigen-presenting cells, Th1 cells, Th2 cells, regulatory T cells, B cells, neonatal mouse model, therapeutic vaccines, neonatal infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Humans, Immune System, Immunity, Innate, Infant, Newborn, B-Lymphocyte Subsets, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Models, Animal, Mice, Adaptive Immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review