Cited by 1,311Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes

Open access
The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether intensive glycemic control, combination therapy for dyslipidemia, and intensive blood-pressure control would limit the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes. Previous data suggest that these systemic factors may be important in the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: In a randomized trial, we enrolled 10,251 participants with type 2 diabetes who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease to receive either intensive or standard treatment for glycemia (target glycated hemoglobin level, <6.0% or 7.0 to 7.9%, respectively) and also for dyslipidemia (160 mg daily of fenofibrate plus simvastatin or placebo plus simvastatin) or for systolic blood-pressure control (target, <120 or <140 mm Hg). A subgroup of 2856 participants was evaluated for the effects of these interventions at 4 years on the progression of diabetic retinopathy by 3 or more steps on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Severity Scale (as assessed from seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs, with 17 possible steps and a higher number of steps indicating greater severity) or the development of diabetic retinopathy necessitating laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy. RESULTS: At 4 years, the rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy were 7.3% with intensive glycemia treatment, versus 10.4% with standard therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.87; P=0.003); 6.5% with fenofibrate for intensive dyslipidemia therapy, versus 10.2% with placebo (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.87; P=0.006); and 10.4% with intensive blood-pressure therapy, versus 8.8% with standard therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.79; P=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive glycemic control and intensive combination treatment of dyslipidemia, but not intensive blood-pressure control, reduced the rate of progression of diabetic retinopathy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00000620 for the ACCORD study and NCT00542178 for the ACCORD Eye study.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1001288

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the ACCORD trial, intensive therapy targeting an A1C <6.0% did not significantly reduce the primary composite major CV outcomes compared with standard therapy targeting an A1C of 7.0% to 7.9% (HR 0.90, p=0.16).

    “The primary composite major CV outcomes (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke or death from CV causes) were not reduced significantly in ACCORD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, p=0.16).”

    From Targets for Glycemic Control (2018) · cites this paper as [21]

    Methods > The ACCORD Study (page not provided) gives the A1C targets and defines the primary cardiovascular composite as nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. The cited paper does not report the claimed nonsignificant result, HR 0.90, or p=0.16 for that outcome; its reported treatment results concern retinopathy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In people with type 2 diabetes, an A1C ≤6.5% may be targeted to reduce the risk of CKD and retinopathy, if they are assessed to be at low risk of hypoglycemia based on class of antihyperglycemic medication(s) utilized and the person's characteristics.

    “In people with type 2 diabetes, an A1C ≤6.5% may be targeted to reduce the risk of CKD [Grade A, Level 1A (23)] and retinopathy [Grade A, Level 1A (21)], if they are assessed to be at low risk of hypoglycemia based on class of antihyperglycemic medication(s) utilized and the person's characteristics [Grade D, Consensus].”

    From Targets for Glycemic Control (2018) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results report less retinopathy progression with intensive glycemic therapy (7.3% versus 10.4%); the intensive group's median A1C at one year was 6.4%. However, the Methods specify a target below 6.0%, not ≤6.5%, so this study supports intensive control for retinopathy but does not directly test the cited threshold. CKD and the hypoglycemia-risk qualification have separate attributions in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The UK Prospective Diabetes Study randomly assigned 4209 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes to receive conventional vs intensive treatment, with mean attained HbA1C of 7.9% vs 7.0%, respectively.

    “The UK Prospective Diabetes Study randomly assigned 4209 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes to receive conventional (primarily diet) vs intensive (insulin, sulfonylurea, or, if overweight, metformin) treatment, with mean attained HbA1C of 7.9% vs 7.0%, respectively.36,37”

    From Diagnosis and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [36]

    The References section identifies UKPDS 33 as comparing intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin against conventional treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Our copy does not give the claimed 4209 participants, newly diagnosed status, metformin or diet regimens, or attained HbA1c values of 7.9% and 7.0%. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lifestyle intervention or bariatric surgery in T2D, or physical activity in T1D, can stabilize retinopathy.

    “Other options that can stabilize retinopathy include lifestyle intervention or bariatric surgery in persons with T2D or physical activity in persons with T1D.524–527”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [527]

    The Methods and Discussion (pages not provided) examine intensive glycemic treatment, fenofibrate plus statin therapy, and blood-pressure treatment in people with type 2 diabetes. Our copy does not address whether lifestyle intervention, bariatric surgery, or physical activity stabilizes retinopathy; searches for those interventions returned no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fenofibrate reduces the progression of diabetic retinopathy.

    “Fenofibrate reduces the progression of diabetic retinopathy.413,414”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [414]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group
Corresponding author
The ACCORD Study Group and ACCORD Eye Study Group
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
363
Issue
3
Pages
233-244
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2219384223
Cited by
1,311
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 93
FWCI
111.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Massachusetts Medical Society
  • Omron Healthcare
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Servier
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95183-23-0-0, n01hc95180-24-0-1, n01hc95184-24-0-1, n01hc95181-23-0-1, n01hc95182-23-0-1, Z99 EY999999, n01hc95178-28-0-1, n01hc95179-25-0-0)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01- HC-95181, R01HL073030, N01 HC095184, N01-HC- 95180, N01-HC-95178, N01 HC095182, N01 HC095181, Y01 HC001010, N01-HC-095183, N01 HC095178, N01-HC-95184, N01HC95179, IAAY1-HC-1010, IAA #Y1-HC-9035, N01 HC095180, Y01 HC009035, N01‐HC‐95183, N01-HC-95182, N01 HC095179)
  • National Eye Institute (ZIAEY000410)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy progression, type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, HbA1c, fenofibrate, simvastatin, dyslipidemia, blood pressure control, laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, cardiovascular risk reduction, combination therapy, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypertension, Hypoglycemic Agents, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Disease Progression, Simvastatin, Dyslipidemias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review