Cited by 13Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Nursing workload: use of artificial intelligence to develop a classifier model

Open access
Rosa, Ninon Girardon da, Vaz, Tiago Andres, Lucena, Amália de Fátima·2024·Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to describe the development of a predictive nursing workload classifier model, using artificial intelligence. METHOD: retrospective observational study, using secondary sources of electronic patient records, using machine learning. The convenience sample consisted of 43,871 assessments carried out by clinical nurses using the Perroca Patient Classification System, which served as the gold standard, and clinical data from the electronic medical records of 11,774 patients, which constituted the variables. In order to organize the data and carry out the analysis, the Dataiku® data science platform was used. Data analysis occurred in an exploratory, descriptive and predictive manner. The study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the institution where the study was carried out. RESULTS: the use of artificial intelligence enabled the development of the nursing workload assessment classifier model, identifying the variables that most contributed to its prediction. The algorithm correctly classified 72% of the variables and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was 82%. CONCLUSION: a predictive model was developed, demonstrating that it is possible to train algorithms with data from the patient's electronic medical record to predict the nursing workload and that artificial intelligence tools can be effective in automating this activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1518-8345.7131.4239

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Buffon M. R. Severo I. M. Mergen T. Rosa N. G. Almeida M. A. Lucena A. F. Correspondence between NANDA International nursing diagnoses and Perroca’s patient classification Rev Min Enferm 2021 25: 10.5935/1415-2762-20210048 e 400 · DOI
  2. [33]Quadros D. V. Lima J. S. Kreling A. Pereira A. P. L. Barbosa A. S. Magalhães A. M. M. Occurrence of falls in clinical-surgical units and the degree of care complexity Res Soc Dev 2022 11 14 10.33448/rsd-v11i14.36411 e362111436411 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosa, N. G. D., Vaz, T. A., & Lucena, A. D. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Venue
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Published
2024
Volume
32
Pages
e4239-e4239
ISSN
  • 0104-1169 (ISSN-L)
  • 1518-8345
OpenAlex
W4400362060
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
nursing workload, workload prediction, electronic health records, machine learning classifiers, artificial intelligence in nursing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing, Retrospective Studies, Workload, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review