CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Validação brasileira do Instrumento de Qualidade de Vida/espiritualidade, religião e crenças pessoais

Open access
Panzini, Raquel Gehrke, Maganha, Camila, Rocha, Neusa Sica da, Bandeira, Denise Ruschel, Fleck, Marcelo P·2011·Revista de Saúde Pública
DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100018
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJETIVO: Analisar propriedades psicométricas do Instrumento de Qualidade de Vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde - Módulo Espiritualidade, Religiosidade e Crenças Pessoais (WHOQOL-SRPB). MÉTODOS: O WHOQOL-SRPB, a Escala de Coping Religioso/Espiritual Abreviada (CRE-Breve), o WHOQOL-Breve e o BDI foram consecutivamente aplicados em amostra de conveniência de 404 pacientes e funcionários de hospital universitário e funcionários de universidade, em Porto Alegre, RS, entre 2006 e 2009. A amostra foi estratificada por sexo, idade, estado de saúde e religião/crença. O reteste dos dois primeiros instrumentos foi realizado com 54 participantes. Análises fatoriais exploratórias do WHOQOL-SRPB pelo método dos componentes principais foram realizadas sem delimitar o número de fatores, solicitando oito fatores e em conjunto com os itens do WHOQOL-Breve. RESULTADOS: O WHOQOL-SRPB em português brasileiro (Domínio SRPB-Geral) apresentou validade de construto, com validade discriminativa entre crentes de não-crentes (t = 7,40; p = 0,0001); validade relacionada ao critério concorrente, discriminando deprimidos de não-deprimidos (t = 5,03; p = 0,0001); validade convergente com o WHOQOL-Breve (com físico r = 0,18; psicológico r = 0,46; social r = 0,35; ambiental r = 0,29; global r = 0,23; p = 0,0001) e com o Domínio SRPB do WHOQOL-100 (r = 0,78; p = 0,0001); e validade convergente/discriminante com a Escala CRE-Breve (com CREpositivo r = 0,64; p = 0,0001/CREnegativo r = -0,03; p = 0,554). Observou-se excelente fidedignidade teste-reteste (t = 0,74; p = 0,463) e consistência interna (α = 0,96; correlação intrafatorial 0,87 > r > 0,60, p = 0,0001). As análises fatoriais exploratórias realizadas corroboraram a estrutura de oito fatores do estudo multicêntrico do WHOQOL-SRPB. CONCLUSÕES: O WHOQOL-SRPB em português brasileiro apresentou boas qualidades psicométricas e uso válido e fidedigno para uso no Brasil. Sugerem-se novos estudos com populações específicas, como diferentes religiões, grupos culturais e/ou doenças.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100018

Cites

17 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fleck MPA, 2002, [Association of depressive symptoms and social functioning in primary care service, Brazil], Rev Saude Publica., 36, 431
  2. Koenig HG, 2001, Religion and coping with serious medical illness, Ann Pharmacother., 35, 352, 10.1345/aph.10215 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rocha NS, 2007, Desenvolvimento do módulo para avaliar espiritualidade, religiosidade e crenças pessoais do WHOQOL-100 (WHOQOL-SRPB), 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Panzini, R. G., Maganha, C., Rocha, N. S. D., Bandeira, D. R., & Fleck, M. P.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Revista de Saúde Pública
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Published
2011-02
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
153-165
ISSN
0034-8910 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1590/s0034-89102011000100018
OpenAlex
W1527268596
Cited by
113
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Revista de Saúde Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
WHOQOL-SRPB, spirituality, personal beliefs, quality of life, psychometric validation, Brazilian version, construct validity, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, depression, university hospital patients, university employees, religious affiliation, WHOQOL-BREF, WHOQOL-100, Porto Alegre
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Psychology, World Health Organization, Reproducibility of Results, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review