The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How and why to measure the germination process?
Open accessAbstract
In the last two centuries, papers have been published including measurements of the germination process. High diversity of mathematical expressions has made comparisons between papers and some times the interpretation of results difficult. Thus, in this paper is included a review about measurements of the germination process, with an analysis of the several mathematical expressions included in the specific literature, recovering the history, sense, and limitations of some germination measurements. Among the measurements included in this paper are the germinability, germination time, coefficient of uniformity of germination (CUG), coefficient of variation of the germination time (CVt), germination rate (mean rate, weighted mean rate, coefficient of velocity, germination rate of George, Timson’s index, GV or Czabator’s index; Throneberry and Smith’s method and its adaptations, including Maguire’s rate; ERI or emergence rate index, germination index, and its modifications), uncertainty associated to the distribution of the relative frequency of germination (U), and synchronization index (Z). The limits of the germination measurements were included to make the interpretation and decisions during comparisons easier. Time, rate, homogeneity, and synchrony are aspects that can be measured, informing the dynamics of the germination process. These characteristics are important not only for physiologists and seed technologists, but also for ecologists because it is possible to predict the degree of successful of a species based on the capacity of their harvest seed to spread the germination through time, permitting the recruitment in the environment of some part of the seedlings formed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives
Paparella, S., Araújo, S. S., Rossi, G., Wijayasinghe, M., Carbonera, D., & Balestrazzi, A. (2015) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-015-1784-y · Cited by 940
Calculating germination measurements and organizing spreadsheets
Ranal, M. A., Santana, D. G. D., Ferreira, W. R., & Mendes-Rodrigues, C. (2009) · Revista Brasileira de Botânica · doi:10.1590/s0100-84042009000400022 · Cited by 264
Self-citationHradilová, I., Duchoslav, M., Brus, J., Pechanec, V., Hýbl, M., Kopecký, P., Smržová, L., Štefelová, N., Vaclávek, T., Bariotakis, M., et al. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6263 · Cited by 52
Guragain, R. P., Baniya, H. B., Pradhan, S. P., Dhungana, S., Chhetri, G. K., Sedhai, B., Basnet, N., Panta, G. P., Joshi, U. M., Pandey, B. P., et al. (2021) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ac4081 · Cited by 31
Sayahi, K., Sari, A. H., Hamidi, A., Nowruzi, B., & Hassani, F. (2024) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-024-04730-4 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranal, M. A., & Santana, D. G. D.
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Botânica
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0100-8404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154091288
- Cited by
- 967
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How and why to measure the germination process? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s0100-84042006000100002
- The paper
- Ranal, M. A., & Santana, D. G. D. (2006). How and why to measure the germination process? Revista Brasileira de Botânica. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-84042006000100002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.