Cited by 22Child Abuse and TraumaPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingDeception detection and forensic psychology

Perícia psicológica no abuso sexual de crianças e adolescentes

Open access
Schaefer, Luiziana Souto, Rossetto, Silvana, Kristensen, Christian Haag·2012·Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa

Abstract

Ao mesmo tempo em que denúncias de abuso sexual contra crianças e adolescentes são frequentes, implicando em medidas protetivas urgentes para as vítimas e punições para os perpetradores, também são crescentes os casos de falsas denúncias. Este artigo tem como principal objetivo revisar, com base na literatura nacional e internacional recente, o papel da perícia psicológica no abuso sexual infantojuvenil. Na comum inexistência de vestígios físicos, uma avaliação psicológica abrangente demonstra-se imprescindível, devendo integrar diferentes fontes de informação e indicadores, já que alguns destes são contraditórios e inespecíficos. O perito deve possuir formação na área de atuação e conhecimentos sobre a legislação vigente, além de assegurar que a avaliação não se torne um elemento abusivo para o periciado.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0102-37722012000200011

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The forensic psychological assessment has acquired a preponderant role as an investigative resource in cases of suspected sexual abuse.

    “The forensic psychological assessment has acquired a preponderant role as an investigative resource in cases of suspected sexual abuse (Gava, Pelisoli, & Dell'Aglio, 2013;Schaefer, Rossetto, & Kristensen, 2012).”

    From Psychological and Behavioral Indicators in the Forensic Assessment of Child Sexual Abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Schaefer, Rossetto, & Kristensen, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, L. S., Rossetto, S., & Kristensen, C. H.
Affiliations
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
Published
2012-06
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
227-234
ISSN
0102-3772 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149320455
Cited by
17
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PUCRS Repository (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
psychological expertise, child sexual abuse, adolescent sexual abuse, false accusation, forensic psychology, psychological assessment, expert witnesses, abuse indicators, child protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review