CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 806Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações

Open access
Borsa, Juliane Callegaro, Damásio, Bruno Figueiredo, Bandeira, Denise Ruschel·2012·Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
DOI 10.1590/s0103-863x2012000300014
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A adaptação de instrumentos psicológicos é um processo complexo que requer elevado rigor metodológico. Por não haver consenso na literatura sobre suas etapas, o presente artigo discute alguns aspectos essenciais concernentes à adaptação transcultural de instrumentos psicológicos e propõe diretrizes aos pesquisadores sobre os diferentes passos desse processo. São apresentadas, também, algumas considerações referentes à validação do instrumento adaptado. Nesta etapa, são discutidos os aspectos referentes à estrutura fatorial do instrumento, a qual requer avaliação por meio de procedimentos estatísticos, como análises fatoriais exploratórias e confirmatórias, sendo fornecidas algumas diretrizes gerais para a validação de instrumentos psicológicos em diferentes culturas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0103-863x2012000300014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cassepp-Borges V., 2010, Tradução e validação de conteúdo: Uma proposta para a adaptação de instrumentos, 506
  2. Sireci S. G., 2005, Using bilinguals to evaluate the comparability of difference language versions of a test, 117
  3. Tanzer N. K., 2005, Developing tests for use in multiple languages and cultures: A plea for simultaneous development, 235
  4. Vivas E., 1999, Estudios transculturales: Una perspectiva desde los trastornos alimentarios, 463

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 804

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Published
2012-12
Volume
22
Issue
53
Pages
423-432
ISSN
0103-863X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1590/s0103-863x2012000300014
OpenAlex
W2009215193
Cited by
806
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
cross-cultural adaptation, psychological assessment instruments, instrument validation, factor structure, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, adaptation guidelines, cross-cultural research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review