Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury

Freire, Fabio Rios, Coelho, Fernanda, Lacerda, Juliana Rhein, Silva, Marcio Fernando da, Gonçalves, Vanessa Tome, Machado, Sergio, Velasques, Bruna, Ribeiro, Pedro, Basile, Luis Fernando Hindi, Oliveira, Arthur Maynart Pereira, Paiva, Wellingson Silva, Kanda, Paulo Afonso Medeiros, Anghinah, Renato·2011·Dementia & Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05010004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Annually, some 500,000 people are hospitalized with brain lesions acquired after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Brazil. Between 75,000 and 100,000 individuals die within hours of the event and 70,000 to 90,000 evolve to irreversible loss of some neurological function. The principal causes of TBI include motor vehicle accidents (50%), falls (21%), assaults and robberies (12%) and accidents during leisure activities (10%). Within this context, cognitive rehabilitation, a clinical area encompassing interdisciplinary action aimed at recovery as well as compensation of cognitive functions altered as a result of cerebral injury, is extremely important for these individuals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the basic concepts related to TBI, including mechanisms of injury, severity levels of TBI, the most common findings in moderate and severe TBI survivors, and the most frequent cognitive impairments following TBI, and also to discuss the strategies used to handle patients post-TBI. The study results yielded relevant information on a structured cognitive rehabilitation service, representing an alternative for patients and families afflicted by TBI, enabling the generation of multiple research protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05010004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Jang SH, 2009, Review of motor recovery in patients with traumatic brain injury, NeuroRehabilitation, 24, 349, 10.3233/NRE-2009-0489 · doi:10.3233/nre-2009-0489
  2. Cattelani R, 2010, Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: a systematic review, Neuropsychol Rev, 20, 52, 10.1007/s11065-009-9125-y · DOI
  3. Cappa SF, 2005, Task force on cognitive rehabilitation: European Federation of Neurological Societies. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force, Eur J Neurol, 12, 665, 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01330.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Thornton KE, 2008, Efficacy of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: interventions of QEEG-guided biofeedback, computers, strategies, and medications, Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 33, 101, 10.1007/s10484-008-9056-z · DOI
  5. Jennett B, 1981, Disability after severe head injury: observations on use of Glasgow Outcome Scale, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 44, 285, 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Silva SCF, 2007, Galveston orientation and amnesia test: tradução e validação, Acta Paul Enferm, 24, 10.1590/S0103-21002007000100005 · doi:10.1590/s0103-21002007000100005
  7. Braakman R, 1988, Prognosis of the posttraumatic vegetative state, Acta Neurochir, 95, 49, 10.1007/BF01793082 · DOI
  8. Tuel SM, 1992, Functional improvement in severe head injury after readmission for rehabilitation, Brain Inj, 6, 363, 10.3109/02699059209034951 · doi:10.3109/02699059209034951
  9. Katz RT, 1992, Sequelae of minor traumatic brain injury, Am Fam Physician, 46, 1491
  10. Zafonte RD, 1996, Relationship between Glasgow coma scale and functional outcome, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 75, 364, 10.1097/00002060-199609000-00012 · DOI
  11. Vallat-Azouvi C, 2007, Working memory after severe traumatic brain injury, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 13, 770, 10.1017/S1355617707070993 · DOI
  12. Folstein MH, 1975, "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for clinicians., J Psychiat Res, 12, 189
  13. Bertolucci PHF, 1994, Proposta de padronização do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM): estudo piloto cooperativo (FMUSP/EPM), Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 52, 225
  14. Yesavage JA, 1982, Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report, J Psychiatr Res, 17, 37, 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pfeffer RI, 1982, Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community, J Gerontol, 37, 323, 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sawchyn JM, 2000, Note on the use of the Postconcussion Syndrome Checklist, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 15, 1, 10.1093/arclin/15.1.1 · DOI
  17. Rey A, 1941, L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique, Arch Psychol, 28, 286
  18. Brucki SMD, 2004, Category fluency test: effects of age, gender and education on total scores, clustering and switching in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking subjects, Braz J Med Biol Res, 37, 1771, 10.1590/S0100-879X2004001200002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Erez ABH, 2009, Executive functioning, awareness, and participation in daily life after mild traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study, Am J Occup Ther, 63, 634, 10.5014/ajot.63.5.634 · DOI
  20. Powell JM, 2007, Gaining insight into patients' perspectives on participation in home management activities after traumatic brain injury, Am J Occup Ther, 61, 269, 10.5014/ajot.61.3.269 · doi:10.5014/ajot.61.3.269
  21. Hartman-Maeir A, 2009, Cognitive functional evaluation (CFE) process for individuals with suspected cognitive disabilities, Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 23, 1, 10.1080/07380570802455516 · DOI
  22. Katz N, 1989, Loewenstein occupational. Therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity, Am J Occup Ther, 43, 184, 10.5014/ajot.43.3.184 · DOI
  23. Brayman SJ, 2009, Commission on practice: guidelines for supervision, roles, and responsibilities during the delivery of occupational therapy services, Am J Occup Ther, 63, 797, 10.5014/ajot.63.6.797 · DOI

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Freire, F. R., Coelho, F., Lacerda, J. R., Silva, M. F. D., Gonçalves, V. T., Machado, S., Velasques, B., Ribeiro, P., Basile, L. F. H., Oliveira, A. M. P., Paiva, W. S., Kanda, P. A. M., & Anghinah, R.
Affiliations
  • University of São Paulo, Brazil
  • UFRJ, Brazil
Venue
Dementia & Neuropsychologia
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Published
2011-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
17-25
ISSN
1980-5764
DOI
10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05010004
Cited by
15
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05010004
The paper
Freire, F. R., Coelho, F., Lacerda, J. R., Silva, M. F. D., Gonçalves, V. T., Machado, S., Velasques, B., Ribeiro, P., Basile, L. F. H., Oliveira, A. M. P., Paiva, W. S., Kanda, P. A. M., & Anghinah, R. (2011). Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Dementia & Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-57642011dn05010004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.