Cited by 39Parasitic infections in humans and animalsHelminth infection and controlParasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Parasitas zoonóticos em fezes de cães em praças públicas do município de Itabuna, Bahia, Brasil

Open access
Campos Filho, Pedro C., Barros, Laise M., Campos, Jamille O., Braga, Vânia B., Cazorla, Irene M., Albuquerque, George R., Carvalho, Sílvia M.S.·2008·Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária

Abstract

Avaliou-se a contaminação de praças públicas da área urbana do município de Itabuna, BA, Brasil, por parasitos zoonóticos presentes em fezes de cães. Foram coletadas 119 amostras fecais de cães em 10 praças. Logo após, estas fezes foram encaminhadas ao Laboratório de Parasitologia da UESC e analisadas pelo método de Mariano e Carvalho. Do total das amostras analisadas, 56,3% continham alguma forma evolutiva parasitária, sendo o parasita mais freqüente Ancylostoma sp. com 47,9%, seguido por 6,7% de Strongyloides stercortalis, 4,2% tanto para ovos de Toxocara canis quanto de Trichuris vulpis, 2,5% para cistos de Endolimax nana, e 0,8% tanto para cistos de Giardia intestinalis quanto para os de Entamoeba coli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1984-29612008000400007

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Campos Filho, P. C., Barros, L. M., Campos, J. O., Braga, V. B., Cazorla, I. M., Albuquerque, G. R., & Carvalho, S. M. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz
  • Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (BR)
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
Published
2008-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
206-209
ISSN
  • 0103-846X (ISSN-L)
  • 1984-2961
OpenAlex
W1868400156
Cited by
39
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária/Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Keywords
zoonotic parasites, dogs, fecal contamination, public squares, Ancylostoma, Strongyloides stercoralis, Toxocara canis, Trichuris vulpis, Endolimax nana, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba coli, urban sanitation, Itabuna
MeSH terms
Animals, Brazil, Dogs, Feces, Public Facilities, Urban Health, Zoonoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review