The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis
Abstract
An analyst using household survey data to construct a welfare metric is often confronted with onfronted with An analyst using household survey data to construct a welfare metric is often confronted with a number of theoretical and practical problems. What components should be included in the overall welfare measure? Should differences in tastes be taken into account when making comparisons across people and households? How best should differences in cost-of-living and household composition be taken into consideration? Starting with a brief review of the theoretical framework underpinning typical welfare analysis undertaken based on household survey data, this paper provides some practical guidelines and advice on how best to tackle such problems. It outlines a three-part procedure for constructing a consumption-based measure of individual welfare: 1) aggregation of different components of household consumption to construct a nominal consumption aggregate; 2) construction of price indices to adjust for differences in prices faced by households; and 3) adjustment of the real consumption aggregate for differneces in household composition. Examples based on survey data fro eight countries--Ghana, Vietnam, Nepal, the Kyrgyz Republic, Ecuador, South Africa, Panama, and Brazil--are used to illustrate the various steps involved in constructing the welfare measure, and the STATA programs used for this purpose are provided in the appendix. The paper also includes examples of some analytic techniques used to examine the robustness of the estimated welfare measure to underlying assumptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1976) · Annals of Economic and Social Measurement · Cited by 5,035
Economics and Consumer Behavior
Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805653 · Cited by 4,260
Self-citationContingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.45 · Cited by 1,894
Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation
Hanemann, W. M. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.19 · Cited by 1,640
Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food
Deaton, A., & Paxson, C. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250035 · Cited by 546
Self-citationOn Measuring Child Costs: With Applications to Poor Countries
Deaton, A. S., & Muellbauer, J. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261405 · Cited by 522
Self-citationComplementarity-An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory
Samuelson, P. A. (1974) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 473
Widowhood and poverty in rural India: Some inferences from household survey data
Drèze, J., & Srinivasan, P. V. (1997) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(97)00041-2 · Cited by 339
Estimation of some limited dependent variable models with application to housing demand
Lee, L., & Trost, R. P. (1978) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(78)90052-0 · Cited by 321
Expected Poverty Under Risk-Induced Welfare Variability
Ravallion, M. D. (1988) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233725 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Cylus, J., Thomson, S., & Evetovits, T. (2018) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.18.209031 · Cited by 821
Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study
Wagstaff, A., Flores, G., Smitz, M.-F., Hsu, J., Chepynoga, K., & Eozenou, P. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30486-2 · Cited by 421
Filmer, D., & Scott, K. (2012) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0077-5 · Cited by 343
Mapping poverty using mobile phone and satellite data
Steele, J. E., Sundsøy, P. R., Pezzulo, C., Alegana, V. A., Bird, T. J., Blumenstock, J., Bjelland, J., Engø-Monsen, K., de Montjoye, Y.-A., Iqbal, A. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0690 · Cited by 328
Global Monitoring Report on Financial Protection in Health 2021
World Health Organization, & Bank, W. (2021) · doi:10.1596/36723 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Deaton, A., & Zaidi, S.
- Publisher
- World Bank
- Published
- 2002-05
- OpenAlex
- W1538200198
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 25.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/0-8213-4990-2
- The paper
- Deaton, A., & Zaidi, S. (2002). Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4990-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.