The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commitments to Save: A Field Experiment in Rural Malawi
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports the results of a field experiment that randomly assigned smallholder cash crop farmers formal savings accounts. In collaboration with a microfinance institution in Malawi, the authors tested two primary treatments, offering either: 1)"ordinary"accounts, or 2) both ordinary and"commitment"accounts. Commitment accounts allowed customers to restrict access to their own funds until a future date of their choosing. A control group was not offered any account but was tracked alongside the treatment groups. Only the commitment treatment had statistically significant effects on subsequent outcomes. The effects were positive and large on deposits and withdrawals immediately prior to the next planting season, agricultural input use in that planting, crop sales from the subsequent harvest, and household expenditures in the period after harvest. Across the set of key outcomes, the commitment savings treatment had larger effects than the ordinary savings treatment. Additional evidence suggests that the positive impacts of commitment derive from keeping funds from being shared with one's social network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects
Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x · Cited by 2,719
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 · Cited by 1,970
Cited by
Financial Inclusion and Development
Sarma, M., & Pais, J. (2011) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.1698 · Cited by 1,208
Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya
Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2350 · Cited by 1,170
Underinvestment in a Profitable Technology: The Case of Seasonal Migration in Bangladesh
(2014) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10489 · Cited by 710
Savings by and for the Poor: A Research Review and Agenda
Karlan, D., Ratan, A. L., & Zinman, J. (2014) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12101 · Cited by 548
Financial Inclusion, Poverty, and Income Inequality in Developing Asia
Park, C.-Y., & Mercado, R. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2558936 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Brune, L., Giné, X., Goldberg, J., & Yang, D.
- Publisher
- World Bank
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W2111631640
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commitments to Save: A Field Experiment in Rural Malawi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/1813-9450-5748
- The paper
- Brune, L., Giné, X., Goldberg, J., & Yang, D. (2011). Commitments to Save: A Field Experiment in Rural Malawi. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.