The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an Interactive Model of Reading
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252
Cited by
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
The cognitive functions of language
Carruthers, P. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000122 · Cited by 728
A Probabilistic Constraints Approach to Language Acquisition and Processing
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 · Cited by 335
Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x · Cited by 325
Montessori education: a review of the evidence base
Marshall, C. (2017) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7 · Cited by 195
Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
Ozuru, Y., Briner, S., Kurby, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0032918 · Cited by 134
Interactive Activation and Mutual Constraint Satisfaction in Perception and Cognition
McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., Bolger, D. J., & Khaitan, P. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12146 · Cited by 122
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Schiff, R. (2016) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1180526 · Cited by 116
McClelland, J. L. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00503 · Cited by 111
Chen, H.-C., & Graves, M. F. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588168 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Rumelhart, D.
- Venue
- Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading
- Publisher
- International Reading Association
- Published
- 2013-03-07
- Pages
- 719-747
- OpenAlex
- W1726407958
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 84.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
