The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners
Abstract
ABSTRACTS: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the development of and interrelations between the language proficiencies and reading abilities of children learning to read in either a first language or a second language. The authors compared the reading‐comprehension, word‐decoding, and oral‐language skills of both high and low SES Dutch third and fourth graders to the skills of low SES minority third and fourth graders from a Turkish or Moroccan background living in the Netherlands. Several tests of reading comprehension, word decoding, oral text comprehension, morphosyntactic knowledge, and vocabulary knowledge were administered at the beginning of third grade, the end of third grade, and the end of fourth grade. The results showed the minority children to be faster decoders than the Dutch low SES children. With respect to reading comprehension and oral language proficiency, however, the minority children were found to lag behind the Dutch children in all respects. With respect to the interrelations between oral‐language skills and reading skills, the development of reading comprehension was found to be influenced more by top‐down comprehension‐based processes than by bottom‐up word‐decoding processes for both the first‐ and second‐language learners. The oral Dutch skills of the minority children played a more prominent role in the explanation of their reading‐comprehension skills than the oral‐language skills of the Dutch children, however.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,120
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,847
Ways with Words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms
Heath, S. B. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841057 · Cited by 5,009
Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print
Cairns, C., & Adams, M. J. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415121 · Cited by 4,376
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
(1993) · Cited by 2,269
Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.
Juel, C. (1988) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437 · Cited by 1,925
Chall, J. S. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,739
Vocabulary : description, acquisition and pedagogy
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1990) · Cited by 1,708
Paton, A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1154 · Cited by 1,292
Cited by
The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension
SCHMITT, N., JIANG, X., & GRABE, W. (2011) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x · Cited by 709
Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: a longitudinal study
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1414 · Cited by 554
Self-citationThe Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 · Cited by 406
Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x · Cited by 368
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0033890 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- DROOP, M., & VERHOEVEN, L.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-103
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2722
- OpenAlex
- W2159227862
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1598/rrq.38.1.4
- The paper
- DROOP, M., & VERHOEVEN, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.38.1.4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.