Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners

DROOP, MIENKE, VERHOEVEN, LUDO·2003·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

ABSTRACTS: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the development of and interrelations between the language proficiencies and reading abilities of children learning to read in either a first language or a second language. The authors compared the reading‐comprehension, word‐decoding, and oral‐language skills of both high and low SES Dutch third and fourth graders to the skills of low SES minority third and fourth graders from a Turkish or Moroccan background living in the Netherlands. Several tests of reading comprehension, word decoding, oral text comprehension, morphosyntactic knowledge, and vocabulary knowledge were administered at the beginning of third grade, the end of third grade, and the end of fourth grade. The results showed the minority children to be faster decoders than the Dutch low SES children. With respect to reading comprehension and oral language proficiency, however, the minority children were found to lag behind the Dutch children in all respects. With respect to the interrelations between oral‐language skills and reading skills, the development of reading comprehension was found to be influenced more by top‐down comprehension‐based processes than by bottom‐up word‐decoding processes for both the first‐ and second‐language learners. The oral Dutch skills of the minority children played a more prominent role in the explanation of their reading‐comprehension skills than the oral‐language skills of the Dutch children, however.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1598/rrq.38.1.4

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
DROOP, M., & VERHOEVEN, L.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
78-103
ISSN
  • 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2722
OpenAlex
W2159227862
Cited by
494
References
46
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1598/rrq.38.1.4
The paper
DROOP, M., & VERHOEVEN, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐ and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.38.1.4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.