The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities
Abstract
This study examined the functions of Instant Messaging (IM) among seven youths who regularly used this digital technology in their daily lives. Grounded in theories of literacy as a social and semiotic practice, this research asked what functions IM served in participants' lives and how their social identities shaped and were shaped by this form of digital literacy. To answer these questions, we conducted interviews and videotaped IM sessions, adapting a verbal reporting procedure to document the IM strategies used. Data analysis involved using qualitative coding procedures informed by grounded theory (Strauss, 1987; Strauss & Corbin, 1990), which led to three patterns related to the functions of IM: language use, social networks, and surveillance. On the level of language use, participants manipulated the tone, voice, word choice, and subject matter of their messages to fit their communication needs, negotiating multiple narratives in the process. On the level of social networks, they designed their practice to enhance social relationships and statuses across contexts. And on the level of surveillance, they circulated texts across buddies, combated unwanted messages, assumed alternative identities, and overcame restrictions to their online communication. These functions revealed that the technological and social affordances of IM, particularly related to patterns of circulation and the hybrid nature of textuality, give rise to a performative and multivoiced social subject. Based on our findings, we discuss new conceptual directions for envisioning the teaching and learning of literacy in digitally mediated times. Este estudio examinó la funciones de la tecnología de los mensajes instantáneos (IM) entre siete jóvenes que usaban regularmente esta tecnología en su vida cotidiana. Sobre la base de las teorías de la alfabetización como una práctica social y semiótica, esta investigación se preguntó qué funciones cumplía IM en las vidas de los participantes y cómo su identidad social conformaba y era conformada por esta forma de alfabetización digital. Para responder a estas preguntas, condujimos entrevistas y grabamos en video sesiones de IM, adaptando un protocolo de registro verbal para documentar las estrategias de IM usadas. El análisis de los datos incluyó procedimientos de codificación cualitativa basados en la teoría fundamentada (“grounded theory,” Strauss, 1987; Strauss & Corbin, 1990) que condujo a tres patrones relacionados con las funciones de IM: uso del lenguaje, redes sociales y vigilancia. En cuanto al uso del lenguaje, los participantes manipularon el tono, la voz, la elección de palabras y el tema de los mensajes para satisfacer sus necesidades comunicativas, negociando narrativas múltiples en el proceso. En el plano de las redes sociales, diseñaron su práctica para promover relaciones sociales y estatus en los distintos contextos. Finalmente en el nivel de la vigilancia, hicieron circular textos entre amigos, deshecharon mensajes no deseados, asumieron identidades alternativas y superaron restricciones a la comunicación online? Estas funciones revelaron que los recursos tecnológicos y sociales de IM, relacionados particularmente a patrones de circulación, así como la naturaleza híbrida de la textualidad, dan lugar a un sujeto social performativo y con diversas voces. Basados en nuestros hallazgos, discutimos nuevas direcciones conceptuales para concebir la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la alfabetización en los tiempos mediados por la digitalización. Diese Studie untersuchte die Funktionen von Instant Messaging (IM) unter sieben Jugendlichen, die regelmäßig diese digitale Technologie in ihrem täglichen Leben benutzten. Fundiert in Theorien der Schreib- und Leseausbildung als soziale und semiotische Praxis, befragte diese Forschung welche Funktionen IM dem Leben der Teilnehmer diente und wie sich durch diese Form des digitalen Schreibens und Lesens ihre sozialen Identitäten gestalteten und sie geprägt wurden. Um diese Fragen zu beantworten, führten wir Interviews und Videoaufzeichnungen der IM Treffen durch, indem wir eine mündliche Berichterstattung zum Dokumentieren der angewandten IM Strategien festlegten. Die Datenanalyse umfaßte die Anwendung qualitativer Kodierungsprozesse, instruiert durch grundlegende Theorien (Strauss, 1987, Strauss & Corbin, 1990), welche zu drei Verhaltensmustern bezogen auf die Funktionen von IM führten: Sprachgebrauch, soziale Verknüpfungen, sowie Kontrollübersicht. Auf der Ebene der Sprachanwendung manipulierten die Teilnehmer Ton, Stimme, Wortwahl und Thema ihrer Mitteilungen in Anpassung ihrer Kommunikationsbedürfnisse, in deren Verlauf sie vielschichtige Schilderungen umsetzten. Sie gestalteten ihre Verhaltensweisen auf der Ebene sozialer Verknüpfungen zur Festigung sozialer Beziehungen und Statusverbesserungen quer durch die Kontexte. Und im Bereich der Kontrollübersicht verbreiteten sie Texte untereinander zwischen Freunden, bekämpften unerwünschte Mitteilung
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Cited by
Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 · Cited by 1,728
Identity, language learning, and social change
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000309 · Cited by 1,168
Literacy and Identity: Examining the Metaphors in History and Contemporary Research
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.44.4.7 · Cited by 444
The Complex World of Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries
BIRR MOJE, E., OVERBY, M., TYSVAER, N., & MORRIS, K. (2008) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157 · Cited by 374
The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum
Leu, D. J., Gregory McVerry, J., Ian O'Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C., & Forzani, E. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.55.1.1 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- LEWIS, C., & FABOS, B.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-501
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029272817
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.