The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text
Abstract
Prior knowledge is extremely impor tant in influencing how we interpret what we read and what we learn from reading (Anderson, 1977). To read well, we must access the knowledge we already have about the topic, or make it available appropriately so that comprehension can occur (Anderson and Pichert, 1978; Bransford, 1983). Despite the research highlighting the importance of this prior knowledge and many calls for more interactive teaching, the reading scripts used for teaching children to read in schools too often ignore the importance of what the children bring to reading. Teachers are instructed to begin by telling chil dren the gist of what they are going to read about and why they should read this particular information. Even when there are directions for teachers to find out what the children already know about the topic, teachers often over look this instruction. As Durkin's classroom observations demonstrated (1984), the most neglected part of reading lessons is that which instructs teachers to elicit children's background knowledge. To help teachers honor what chil dren bring to each reading situation and model for their students the impor tance of accessing appropriate knowl edge sources before reading, we have developed a simple procedure that can be used with nonfiction selections at any grade level and in any content, whether in reading groups or in con tent learning situations. We have found that the simplicity of instructional demands on them makes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90485-1 · Cited by 993
?Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge?
(1979) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117010 · Cited by 101
Cited by
The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture
Shepard, L. A. (2000) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x029007004 · Cited by 2,161
3.6 Minutes per Day: The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade
Duke, N. K. (2000) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.35.2.1 · Cited by 744
(2005) · Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) · Cited by 466
Increasing Situational Interest in the Classroom
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1016619705184 · Cited by 393
Misconceptions About Teaching English‐language Learners
Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.48.2.6 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogle, D. M.
- Venue
- The Reading Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 564-570
- ISSN
- 0034-0561 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967740284
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1598/rt.39.6.11
- The paper
- Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. The Reading Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.39.6.11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.