The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Reading Fluency Norms: A Valuable Assessment Tool for Reading Teachers
Abstract
In 1992, the authors collaborated to develop a set of norms for oral reading fluency for grades 2–5. Since then, interest in and awareness of fluency has greatly increased, and Hasbrouck and Tindal have collaborated further to compile an updated and expanded set of norms for grades 1–8. This article discusses the application of these norms to three important assessment activities related to improving students' reading achievement: Screening students for possible reading problems Diagnosing deficits in students' fluency Monitoring the progress of students receiving supplementary instruction or intensive intervention in reading An overview of the history and purpose for developing measures of oral reading fluency is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children
(1998) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/6023 · Cited by 5,337
Langenberg, D. N. (2000) · Cited by 4,305
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_3 · Cited by 1,525
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n214 · Cited by 1,051
Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children.
Shinn, M. R. (1989) · Guilford Press eBooks · Cited by 911
Fluency: Bridge Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1598/rt.58.6.2 · Cited by 649
Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_4 · Cited by 545
Reading Fluency Assessment and Instruction: What, Why, and How?
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1598/rt.58.8.1 · Cited by 527
Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read
Hillman, J. (2003) · New England Reading Association Journal · Cited by 436
Assessments and Accountability
LINN, R. L. (2000) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x029002004 · Cited by 416
Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement
Shinn, M. R. (1998) · Guilford Press eBooks · Cited by 386
Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge?
Linn, M. C., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. B. (2000) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1176912 · Cited by 292
Psychometric Approaches to the Identification of LD: IQ and Achievement Scores Are Not Sufficient
Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194050380020101 · Cited by 288
Curriculum-Based Oral Reading Fluency Norms for Students in Grades 2 through 5
Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992) · TEACHING Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/004005999202400310 · Cited by 219
Self-citationKaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1998) · Cited by 149
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999) · School Psychology Review · Cited by 149
Hamilton, C., & Shinn, M. R. (2003) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2003.12086195 · Cited by 130
Hosp, M. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2005.12086272 · Cited by 115
Good, R. H., Baker, D. L., & Smolkowski, K. (2000) · Cited by 109
Educational Accountability and Students with Disabilities: Issues and Challenges
McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. (2003) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904803254962 · Cited by 69
One Teacher's Use of Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Changed Opinion
Hasbrouck, J. E., Woldbeck, T., Ihnot, C., & Parker, R. I. (1999) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1207/sldrp1402_5 · Cited by 23
Self-citationHagen-Ansert, S. L. (2002) · Journal of diagnostic medical sonography · doi:10.1177/875647930201800210 · Cited by 15
Cited by
How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate
Brysbaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047 · Cited by 553
Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2011) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888431003623546 · Cited by 140
Blumberg, F. C., Deater-Deckard, K., Calvert, S. L., Flynn, R. M., Green, C. S., Arnold, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2019) · Child Policy Nexus · doi:10.1002/sop2.3 · Cited by 96
Quirk, M., Nylund-Gibson, K., & Furlong, M. (2013) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.11.002 · Cited by 84
Estimating Reading Growth Using Intermittent CBM Progress Monitoring
Jenkins, J. R., Graff, J. J., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2009) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290907500202 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A.
- Venue
- The Reading Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 636-644
- ISSN
- 0034-0561 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2714
- OpenAlex
- W2092102478
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 34.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.