Cited by 7Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsRemote-Sensing Image Classification

Spatio-Temporal Consistency as a Means to Identify Unlabeled Objects in a Continuous Data Field

Open access
Faghmous, James, Nguyen, Hung, Le, Matthew, Kumar, Vipin·2014·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Mesoscale ocean eddies are a critical component of the Earth System as they dominate the ocean's kinetic energy and impact the global distribution of oceanic heat, salinity, momentum, and nutrients. Therefore, accurately representing these dynamic features is critical for our planet's sustainability. The majority of methods that identify eddies from satellite observations analyze the data in a frame-by-frame basis despite the fact that eddies are dynamic objects that propagate across space and time. We introduce the notion of spatio-temporal consistency to identify eddies in a continuous spatio-temporal field, to simultaneously ensure that the features detected are both spatially and temporally consistent. Our spatio-temporal consistency approach allows us to remove most of the expert criteria used in traditional methods to reduce false negatives. The removal of arbitrary heuristics enables us to render more complete eddy dynamics by identifying smaller and longer lived eddies compared to existing methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8771

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of physical principles to constrain spatiotemporal pattern mining algorithms has been explored for finding ocean eddies from satellite data.

    “For example, the use of physical principles to constrain spatiotemporal pattern mining algorithms has been explored in [81], [82] for finding ocean eddies from satellite data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faghmous, J., Nguyen, H., Le, M., & Kumar, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2014-06-20
Volume
28
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2159287270
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1355072, 1029711)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Keywords
ocean eddies, eddy detection, spatiotemporal consistency, mesoscale ocean dynamics, false negative reduction, eddy propagation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review