Cited by 42Climate variability and modelsSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Theory-Guided Data Science for Climate Change

Faghmous, James H., Banerjee, Arindam, Shekhar, Shashi, Steinbach, Michael, Kumar, Vipin, Ganguly, Auroop R., Samatova, Nagiza·2014·Computer

Abstract

To adequately address climate change, we need novel data-science methods that account for the spatiotemporal and physical nature of climate phenomena. Only then will we be able to move from statistical analysis to scientific insights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2014.335

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faghmous, J. H., Banerjee, A., Shekhar, S., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V., Ganguly, A. R., & Samatova, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Computer
Published
2014-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
74-78
ISSN
  • 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0814
OpenAlex
W1990797806
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
climate change, spatio-temporal data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review