Cited by 46Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureNeural Networks and ApplicationsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

On the Challenges of Physical Implementations of RBMs

Open access
Dumoulin, Vincent, Goodfellow, Ian, Courville, Aaron, Bengio, Yoshua·2014·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) are powerful machine learning models, but learning and some kinds of inference in the model require sampling-based approximations, which, in classical digital computers, are implemented using expensive MCMC. Physical computation offers the opportunity to reduce the costof sampling by building physical systems whose natural dynamics correspond to drawing samples from the desired RBM distribution. Such a system avoids the burn-in and mixing cost of a Markov chain. However, hardware implementations of this variety usually entail limitations such as low-precision and limited range of the parameters and restrictions on the size and topology of the RBM. We conduct software simulations to determine how harmful each of these restrictions is. Our simulations are based on the D-Wave Two computer, but the issues we investigate arise in most forms of physical computation.Our findings suggest that designers of new physical computing hardware and algorithms for physical computers should focus their efforts on overcoming the limitations imposed by the topology restrictions of currently existing physical computers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8924

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum algorithms have been proposed using a D-Wave machine or a circuit algorithm that sample from the Boltzmann distribution quadratically faster than is possible classically.

    “Quantum algorithms have been proposed, using a D-Wave machine [101-103] or a circuit algorithm [104]; that sample from the Boltzmann distribution quadratically faster than it is possible classically [23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumoulin, V., Goodfellow, I., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2014-06-21
Volume
28
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2153346333
Cited by
46
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
restricted Boltzmann machine, physical computation, quantum annealing, sampling-based inference, hardware constraints, low-precision arithmetic, network topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review