Cited by 30Machine Learning in HealthcareTensor decomposition and applicationsElectronic Health Records Systems

TaGiTeD: Predictive Task Guided Tensor Decomposition for Representation Learning from Electronic Health Records

Open access
Yang, Kai, Li, Xiang, Liu, Haifeng, Mei, Jing, Xie, Guotong, Zhao, Junfeng, Xie, Bing, Wang, Fei·2017·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

With the better availability of healthcare data, such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), more and more data analytics methodologies are developed aiming at digging insights from them to improve the quality of care delivery. There are many challenges on analyzing EHR, such as high dimensionality and event sparsity. Moreover, different from other application domains, the EHR analysis algorithms need to be highly interpretable to make them clinically useful. This makes representation learning from EHRs of key importance. In this paper, we propose an algorithm called Predictive Task Guided Tensor Decomposition (TaGiTeD), to analyze EHRs. Specifically, TaGiTeD learns event interaction patterns that are highly predictive for certain tasks from EHRs with supervised tensor decomposition. Compared with unsupervised methods, TaGiTeD can learn effective EHR representations in a more focused way. This is crucial because most of the medical problems have very limited patient samples, which are not enough for unsupervised algorithms to learn meaningful representations form. We apply TaGiTeD on real world EHR data warehouse and demonstrate that TaGiTeD can learn representations that are both interpretable and predictive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10864

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Macskassy, S. A.; Perlich, C.; Leskovec, J.; Wang, W.; and Ghani, R., eds. 2014. The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '14, New York, NY, USA - August 24 - 27, 2014 . ACM.
  2. Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Ghosh, J.; Denny, J. C.; Kho, A.; Chen, Y.; Malin, B. A.; and Sun, J. 2015b. Rubik: Knowledge guided tensor factorization and completion for health data analytics. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 1265-1274.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Li, X., Liu, H., Mei, J., Xie, G., Zhao, J., Xie, B., & Wang, F.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • IBM Research (China) (CN)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2017-02-13
Volume
31
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2604836086
Cited by
30
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1650723)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61472007)
  • China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
electronic health records, representation learning, tensor decomposition, model interpretability, high-dimensional data, medical data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review