Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis
Open accessAbstract
In the quest for artificial general intelligence, Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a focal point in recent advancements. However, the predominant focus remains on developing their capabilities in static image understanding. The potential of MLLMs to process sequential visual data is still insufficiently explored, highlighting the lack of a comprehensive, high-quality assessment of their performance. In this paper, we introduce Video-MME, the first-ever full-spectrum, Multi-Modal Evaluation benchmark of MLLMs in Video analysis. Our work distinguishes from existing benchmarks through four key features: 1) Diversity in video types, spanning 6 primary visual domains with 30 subfields to ensure broad scenario generalizability; 2) Duration in temporal dimension, encompassing both short-, medium-, and long-term videos, ranging from 11 seconds to 1 hour, for robust contextual dynamics; 3) Breadth in data modalities, integrating multi-modal inputs besides video frames, including subtitles and audios, to unveil the all-round capabilities of MLLMs; 4) Quality in annotations, utilizing rigorous manual labeling by expert annotators to facilitate precise and reliable model assessment. With Video-MME, we extensively evaluate various state-of-the-art MLLMs, and reveal that Gemini 1.5 Pro is the best-performing commercial model, significantly outperforming the open-source models with an average accuracy of 75%, compared to 71.9% for GPT-4o. The results also demonstrate that Video-MME is a universal benchmark that applies to both image and video MLLMs. Further analysis indicates that subtitle and audio information could significantly enhance video understanding. Besides, a decline in MLLM performance is observed as video duration increases for all models. Our dataset along with these findings underscores the need for further improvements in handling longer sequences and multi-modal data, shedding light on future MLLM development. Project page: https://video-mme.github.io.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zero-Shot CoT achieves a 1.6% improvement on the general video understanding benchmark VideoMME.
“ZeroShot CoT achieves a 1.6% improvement on the general video understanding benchmark VideoMME [24].”
From Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The Introduction identifies Video-MME as a benchmark for evaluating video understanding. The paper’s evaluation results report model accuracies and gains from subtitles and audio, but the searched passages do not report Zero-Shot CoT or a 1.6% improvement. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost prior works focus on content-level understanding, which primarily serves as a temporal extension of 2D image understanding without 3D spatial consideration.
“Despite their significance, most prior works focus on content-level understanding [24, 43, 55, 63], which primarily serves as a temporal extension of 2D image understanding without 3D spatial consideration.”
From Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The Related Work section describes video models that encode individual frames and add temporal modeling, while the MLLM Benchmarks section discusses prior benchmarks for understanding video content. Those passages support the broad characterization of earlier work as focused on video content, but they do not establish that most prior work lacks 3D spatial consideration. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEstablished benchmarks such as VideoMME and EgoSchema also employ default sampling.
“Established benchmarks ( e.g ., VideoMME [24] and EgoSchema [55]) also employ default sampling, reinforcing this perspective.”
From Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answering
Lei, J., Yu, L., Bansal, M., & Berg, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1167 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI
Yue, X., Ni, Y., Zheng, T., Zhang, K., Liu, R., Zhang, G., Stevens, S., Jiang, D., Ren, W., Sun, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
HERO: Hierarchical Encoder for Video+Language Omni-representation Pre-training
Li, L., Chen, Y.-C., Cheng, Y., Gan, Z., Yu, L., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.161 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationActivityNet-QA: A Dataset for Understanding Complex Web Videos via Question Answering
Yu, Z., Xu, D., Yu, J., Yu, T., Zhao, Z., Zhuang, Y., & Tao, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019127 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions
Mishra, S., Khashabi, D., Baral, C., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.244 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
MovieChat: From Dense Token to Sparse Memory for Long Video Understanding
Song, E., Chai, W., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, F., Chi, H., Guo, X., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01725 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, et al. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. In NeurIPS, 2022. 3
- Chen An, Fei Huang, Jun Zhang, Shansan Gong, Xipeng Qiu, Chang Zhou, and Lingpeng Kong. Training-free long- context scaling of large language models. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 8
- Kirolos Ataallah, Chenhui Gou, Eslam Abdelrahman, Khushbu Pahwa, Jian Ding, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. In- finibench: A comprehensive benchmark for large multi- modal models in very long video understanding. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Anas Awadalla, Irena Gao, Josh Gardner, Jack Hessel, Yusuf Hanafy, Wanrong Zhu, Kalyani Marathe, Yonatan Bitton, Samir Gadre, Shiori Sagawa, Jenia Jitsev, Simon Kornblith, Pang Wei Koh, Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, and Ludwig Schmidt. Openflamingo: An open-source frame- work for training large autoregressive vision-language mod- els. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. Qwen-vl: A frontier large vision-language model with versatile abilities. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 2, 6
- Lin Chen, Xilin Wei, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Zehui Chen, Haodong Duan, Bin Lin, Zhenyu Tang, et al. Sharegpt4video: Improving video understanding and generation with better captions. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 6
- Sishuo Chen, Lei Li, Shuhuai Ren, Rundong Gao, Yuanxin Liu, Xiaohan Bi, Xu Sun, and Lu Hou. Towards multimodal video paragraph captioning models robust to missing modal- ity. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 8
- Xiuyuan Chen, Yuan Lin, Yuchen Zhang, and Weiran Huang. Autoeval-video: An automatic benchmark for assessing large vision language models in open-ended video question answering. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Hao Tian, Shenglong Ye, Zhang- wei Gao, Erfei Cui, Wenwen Tong, Kongzhi Hu, Jiapeng Luo, Zheng Ma, et al. How far are we to gpt-4v? closing the gap to commercial multimodal models with open-source suites. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 2, 6
- Wenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong, Junqi Zhao, Weisheng Wang, Boyang Li, Pascale Fung, and Steven Hoi. Instructblip: Towards general- purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3, 8
- Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Syl- vain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In ICLR, 2021. 3
- Xinyu Fang, Kangrui Mao, Haodong Duan, Xiangyu Zhao, Yining Li, Dahua Lin, and Kai Chen. Mmbench-video: A long-form multi-shot benchmark for holistic video under- standing. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Chaoyou Fu, Peixian Chen, Yunhang Shen, Yulei Qin, Mengdan Zhang, Xu Lin, Zhenyu Qiu, Wei Lin, Jinrui Yang, Xiawu Zheng, et al. Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 3
- Chaoyou Fu, Haojia Lin, Zuwei Long, Yunhang Shen, Meng Zhao, Yifan Zhang, Shaoqi Dong, Xiong Wang, Di Yin, Long Ma, et al. Vita: Towards open-source interactive omni multimodal llm. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 6
- Chaoyou Fu, Haojia Lin, Xiong Wang, Yi-Fan Zhang, Yun- hang Shen, Xiaoyu Liu, Haoyu Cao, Zuwei Long, Heting Gao, Ke Li, et al. Vita-1.5: Towards gpt-4o level real-time vision and speech interaction. ArXiv preprint, 2025. 1, 6
- De-An Huang, Shijia Liao, Subhashree Radhakrishnan, Hongxu Yin, Pavlo Molchanov, Zhiding Yu, and Jan Kautz. Lita: Language instructed temporal-localization assistant. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Yunseok Jang, Yale Song, Youngjae Yu, Youngjin Kim, and Gunhee Kim. TGIF-QA: toward spatio-temporal reasoning in visual question answering. In CVPR, 2017. 3
- Peng Jin, Ryuichi Takanobu, Caiwan Zhang, Xiaochun Cao, and Li Yuan. Chat-univi: Unified visual representation em- powers large language models with image and video under- standing. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 6
- Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven C. H. Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In ICML, 2023. 3
- KunChang Li, Yinan He, Yi Wang, Yizhuo Li, Wen- hai Wang, Ping Luo, Yali Wang, Limin Wang, and Yu Qiao. Videochat: Chat-centric video understanding. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3, 8
- Kunchang Li, Yali Wang, Yinan He, Yizhuo Li, Yi Wang, Yi Liu, Zun Wang, Jilan Xu, Guo Chen, Ping Luo, et al. Mvbench: A comprehensive multi-modal video understand- ing benchmark. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 3, 6
- Linjie Li, Jie Lei, Zhe Gan, Licheng Yu, Yen-Chun Chen, Rohit Pillai, Yu Cheng, Luowei Zhou, Xin Eric Wang, William Yang Wang, et al. Value: A multi-task benchmark for video-and-language understanding evaluation. ArXiv preprint, 2021. 3
- Lei Li, Yuwei Yin, Shicheng Li, Liang Chen, Peiyi Wang, Shuhuai Ren, Mukai Li, Yazheng Yang, Jingjing Xu, Xu Sun, Lingpeng Kong, and Qi Liu. M 3 IT: A large-scale dataset towards multi-modal multilingual instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 8
- Lei Li, Yuqi Wang, Runxin Xu, Peiyi Wang, Xiachong Feng, Lingpeng Kong, and Qi Liu. Multimodal arxiv: A dataset for improving scientific comprehension of large vision-language models. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Shicheng Li, Lei Li, Shuhuai Ren, Yuanxin Liu, Yi Liu, Rundong Gao, Xu Sun, and Lu Hou. Vitatecs: A diag- nostic dataset for temporal concept understanding of video- language models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 3, 8
- Bin Lin, Bin Zhu, Yang Ye, Munan Ning, Peng Jin, and Li Yuan. Video-llava: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 6
- Ji Lin, Hongxu Yin, Wei Ping, Yao Lu, Pavlo Molchanov, Andrew Tao, Huizi Mao, Jan Kautz, Mohammad Shoeybi, and Song Han. Vila: On pre-training for visual language models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 2, 6
- Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Hao Liu, Wilson Yan, Matei Zaharia, and Pieter Abbeel. World model on million-length video and language with ringattention. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 8
- Hao Liu, Matei Zaharia, and Pieter Abbeel. Ring atten- tion with blockwise transformers for near-infinite context. In ICLR, 2024. 8
- Ruyang Liu, Chen Li, Haoran Tang, Yixiao Ge, Ying Shan, and Ge Li. St-llm: Large language models are effective tem- poral learners. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 6
- Ruibo Liu, Jerry Wei, Fangyu Liu, Chenglei Si, Yanzhe Zhang, Jinmeng Rao, Steven Zheng, Daiyi Peng, Diyi Yang, Denny Zhou, et al. Best practices and lessons learned on synthetic data for language models. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 8
- Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Songyang Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yike Yuan, Jiaqi Wang, Conghui He, Ziwei Liu, et al. Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Yuanxin Liu, Shicheng Li, Yi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, Shuhuai Ren, Lei Li, Sishuo Chen, Xu Sun, and Lu Hou. Temp- compass: Do video llms really understand videos? ArXiv preprint, 2024. 1, 3
- Shayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Denny Zhou, Quoc V Le, Barret Zoph, Jason Wei, et al. The flan collection: Designing data and methods for effective instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 8
- Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu, Chun yue Li, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Hao Cheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. Mathvista: Evaluating math rea- soning in visual contexts with gpt-4v, bard, and other large multimodal models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 3
- Ruipu Luo, Ziwang Zhao, Min Yang, Junwei Dong, Ming- Hui Qiu, Pengcheng Lu, Tao Wang, and Zhongyu Wei. Val- ley: Video assistant with large language model enhanced ability. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Karttikeya Mangalam, Raiymbek Akshulakov, and Jitendra Malik. Egoschema: A diagnostic benchmark for very long- form video language understanding. In NeurIPS, 2024. 1, 3, 5, 8
- Munan Ning, Bin Zhu, Yujia Xie, Bin Lin, Jiaxi Cui, Lu Yuan, Dongdong Chen, and Li Yuan. Video-bench: A com- prehensive benchmark and toolkit for evaluating video-based large language models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Long Qian, Juncheng Li, Yu Wu, Yaobo Ye, Hao Fei, Tat- Seng Chua, Yueting Zhuang, and Siliang Tang. Momen- tor: Advancing video large language model with fine-grained temporal reasoning. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, 2021. 3
- Shuhuai Ren, Sishuo Chen, Shicheng Li, Xu Sun, and Lu Hou. TESTA: Temporal-spatial token aggregation for long- form video-language understanding. In EMNLP, 2023. 8
- Shuhuai Ren, Linli Yao, Shicheng Li, Xu Sun, and Lu Hou. Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3, 8
- Gemini Team, Petko Georgiev, Ving Ian Lei, Ryan Burnell, Libin Bai, Anmol Gulati, Garrett Tanzer, Damien Vincent, Zhufeng Pan, Shibo Wang, et al. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of con- text. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 1, 2, 6
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Weihan Wang, Zehai He, Wenyi Hong, Yean Cheng, Xiao- han Zhang, Ji Qi, Xiaotao Gu, Shiyu Huang, Bin Xu, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding, and Jie Tang. Lvbench: An extreme long video understanding benchmark. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Xin Wang, Jiawei Wu, Junkun Chen, Lei Li, Yuan-Fang Wang, and William Yang Wang. Vatex: A large-scale, high- quality multilingual dataset for video-and-language research. In ICCV, 2019. 3
- Yueqian Wang, Xiaojun Meng, Jianxin Liang, Yuxuan Wang, Qun Liu, and Dongyan Zhao. Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Bo Wu and Shoubin Yu. Star: A benchmark for situated reasoning in real-world videos. In NeurIPS, 2024. 3
- Haoning Wu, Dongxu Li, Bei Chen, and Junnan Li. Longvideobench: A benchmark for long-context interleaved video-language understanding. ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3
- Junbin Xiao, Xindi Shang, Angela Yao, and Tat-Seng Chua. Next-qa: Next phase of question-answering to explaining temporal actions. In CVPR, 2021. 3
- D. Xu, Zhou Zhao, Jun Xiao, Fei Wu, Hanwang Zhang, Xi- angnan He, and Yueting Zhuang. Video question answering via gradually refined attention over appearance and motion. In ACM Multimedia, 2017. 3
- Zhiyang Xu, Trevor Ashby, Chao Feng, Rulin Shao, Ying Shen, Di Jin, Qifan Wang, and Lifu Huang. Vision- flan:scaling visual instruction tuning. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 8
- Shukang Yin, Chaoyou Fu, Sirui Zhao, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. A survey on multimodal large language models. National Science Review, 2024. 1, 3
- Weihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Kevin Lin, Zicheng Liu, Xinchao Wang, and Lijuan Wang. Mm-vet: Evaluating large multimodal models for integrated capabilities. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 1, 3
- Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. In ICCV, 2023. 3
- Hang Zhang, Xin Li, and Lidong Bing. Video-llama: An instruction-tuned audio-visual language model for video un- derstanding. ArXiv preprint, 2023. 3
- Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Peng Gao, et al. Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems? ArXiv preprint, 2024. 3, 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces
Yang, J., Yang, S., Gupta, A. W., Han, R., Fei-Fei, L., & Xie, S. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00994 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21631 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across a diverse set of video understanding tasks, encompassing general video understanding (VideoMME (Fu et al., 2024a), MVBench (Li et al., 2024b)), temporal video grounding (Charades-STA (Gao et al., 2017)), video reasoning (VideoMMMU (Hu et al., 2025), MMVU (Zhao et al., 2025)…”
InfluentialSelf-citationSeeing, Listening, Remembering, and Reasoning: A Multimodal Agent with Long-Term Memory
Long, L., He, Y., Ye, W., Pan, Y., Lin, Y., Li, H., Zhao, J., & Li, W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09736 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“To further increase video diversity, we collect extra videos from YouTube following existing practice [7, 9, 32].”
InfluentialSTORM: Token-Efficient Long Video Understanding for Multimodal LLMs
Jiang, J., Li, X., Liu, Z., Li, M., Chen, G., Li, Z., Huang, D.-A., Liu, G., Yu, Z., Keutzer, K., et al. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw69036.2025.00614 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Make Each Token Count: Towards Improving Long-Context Performance with KV Cache Eviction
Bui, N., Nguyen, H. T., Cohan, A., & Ying, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09649
WorldMM: Dynamic Multimodal Memory Agent for Long Video Reasoning
Yeo, W., Kim, K., Yoon, J., & Hwang, S. J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02425
“Current proprietary models, such as GPT-5 [16] and Gemini 2.5 [3], have advanced to minute-or hour-level video understanding [2, 5, 12, 25, 34] by utilizing extended context lengths.”
InfluentialKimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
- Authors
- Fu, C., Dai, Y., Luo, Y., Li, L., Ren, S., Zhang, R., Wang, Z., Zhou, C., Shen, Y., Zhang, M., Chen, P., Li, Y., Lin, S., Zhao, S., Li, K., Xu, T., Zheng, X., Chen, E., Shan, C., He, R., & Sun, X.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University (CN)
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence
- Xiamen University (CN)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Peking University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Institute of Automation (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-06-10
- Pages
- 24108-24118
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413146669
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 168 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 176.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- multimodal large language models, video analysis, evaluation benchmark, multimodal data, expert annotation, Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-4o
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review