The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Build-a-Bot: Teaching Conversational AI Using a Transformer-Based Intent Recognition and Question Answering Architecture
Open accessAbstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes a prominent part of modern life, AI literacy is becoming important for all citizens, not just those in technology careers. Previous research in AI education materials has largely focused on the introduction of terminology as well as AI use cases and ethics, but few allow students to learn by creating their own machine learning models. Therefore, there is a need for enriching AI educational tools with more adaptable and flexible platforms for interested educators with any level of technical experience to utilize within their teaching material. As such, we propose the development of an open-source tool (Build-A-Bot) for students and teachers to not only create their own transformer-based chatbots based on their own course material but also learn the fundamentals of AI through the model creation process. The primary concern of this paper is the creation of an interface for students to learn the principles of artificial intelligence by using a natural language pipeline to train a customized model to answer questions based on their own school curriculums. The model uses contexts given by their instructor, such as chapters of a textbook, to answer questions and is deployed on an interactive chatbot/voice agent. The pipeline teaches students data collection, data augmentation, intent recognition, and question answering by having them work through each of these processes while creating their AI agent, diverging from previous chatbot work where students and teachers use the bots as black-boxes with no abilities for customization or the bots lack AI capabilities, with the majority of dialogue scripts being rule-based. In addition, our tool is designed to make each step of this pipeline intuitive for students at a middle-school level. Further work primarily lies in providing our tool to schools and seeking student and teacher evaluations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The theory of student-centered learning positions students as active agents who construct their own knowledge through interaction, collaboration, and reflection.
“Second, the theory of student-centered learning, which positions students as active agents who construct their own knowledge through interaction, collaboration, and reflection (Pearce et al., 2023).”
From Wordwall and Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) as Student-Centered, Deep Learning-Based Media for Islamic Education in Elementary Schools (2026) · cites this paper as Pearce et al., 2023
The “Constructivist Educational Model” section (page unavailable) describes students taking responsibility for learning and constructing understanding through interaction and collaborative problem-solving. It does not describe reflection as part of that process, so the full claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653
Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Data
Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1009 · Cited by 296
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Feng, S. Y.; Gangal, V.; Wei, J.; Chandar, S.; Vosoughi, S.; Mitamura, T.; and Hovy, E. H. 2021. A Survey of Data Aug- mentation Approaches for NLP. CoRR, abs/2105.03075. · arXiv
- Foster, G.; and Stagl, S. 2018. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an inverted (flipped) classroom model eco- nomics for sustainable education course. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 1323-1336.
- Gorton, I.; Wynne, A.; Liu, Y.; and Yin, J. 2011. Compo- nents in the Pipeline. IEEE Software, 28(3): 34-40.
- J. Bancifra, J. 2022. Supervisory practices of Department Heads and teachers' performance: Towards A proposed En- hancement Program. APJAET -Journal ay Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 25-33.
- Kim, S.; Jang, Y.; Kim, W.; Choi, S.; Jung, H.; Kim, S.; and Kim, H. 2021. Why and What to Teach: AI Curriculum for Elementary School. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(17): 15569-15576.
- Kiperwasser, E.; and Goldberg, Y. 2016. Simple and Accu- rate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representations. Transactions of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, 4: 313-327.
- Li, R.; Lund, A.; and Nordsteien, A. 2021. The link between flipped and active learning: a scoping review. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0): 1-35.
- Piaget, J. 1955. The Construction of Reality in the Child. Routledge amp; Kegan Paul.
- Rajpurkar, P.; Zhang, J.; Lopyrev, K.; and Liang, P. 2016. SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text. CoRR, abs/1606.05250. · arXiv
- Sabuncuoglu, A. 2020. Designing One Year Curriculum to Teach Artificial Intelligence for Middle School. In Pro- ceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '20, 96-102. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450368742.
- Slavich, G. M.; and Zimbardo, P. G. 2012. Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 24(4): 569-608.
- Tao, C.; Feng, J.; Yan, R.; Wu, W.; and Jiang, D. 2021. A Survey on Response Selection for Retrieval-based Di- alogues. In Zhou, Z.-H., ed., Proceedings of the Thirti- eth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21, 4619-4626. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. Survey Track.
- Touretzky, D.; Gardner-McCune, C.; Breazeal, C.; Martin, F.; and Seehorn, D. 2019a. A Year in K-12 AI Education. AI Magazine, 40(4): 88-90.
- Touretzky, D. S.; Gardner-Mccune, C.; Martin, F. G.; and Seehorn, D. W. 2019b. Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI? In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Utah State Board of Education OER. 2022. 5th Grade for Utah SEEd Standards. CK-12 Foundation.
- Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, L.; and Polosukhin, I. 2017. At- tention Is All You Need. CoRR, abs/1706.03762. · arXiv
- Wang, A.; Singh, A.; Michael, J.; Hill, F.; Levy, O.; and Bowman, S. 2018. GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, 353- 355. Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Lin- guistics.
- Wollowski, M.; Selkowitz, R.; Brown, L.; Goel, A.; Luger, G.; Marshall, J.; Neel, A.; Neller, T.; and Norvig, P. 2016. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, 30(1).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baharsyah, A. T., Kusumawati, R., & Mushoffa, A. (2026) · Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas dan Intelektualitas · doi:10.31942/pgrs.v14i1.15219
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearce, K., Alghowinem, S., & Breazeal, C.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- MIT Media Lab (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-06-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 16025-16032
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W4382317893
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- AI literacy, chatbots, intent classification, question answering, transformer models, open-source educational tools, junior high school students, data augmentation, voice assistants, school curriculum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review