Cited by 44Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and Analysis

SWL-Adapt: An Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Model with Sample Weight Learning for Cross-User Wearable Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Hu, Rong, Chen, Ling, Miao, Shenghuan, Tang, Xing·2023·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In practice, Wearable Human Activity Recognition (WHAR) models usually face performance degradation on the new user due to user variance. Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) becomes the natural solution to cross-user WHAR under annotation scarcity. Existing UDA models usually align samples across domains without differentiation, which ignores the difference among samples. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised domain adaptation model with sample weight learning (SWL-Adapt) for cross-user WHAR. SWL-Adapt calculates sample weights according to the classification loss and domain discrimination loss of each sample with a parameterized network. We introduce the meta-optimization based update rule to learn this network end-to-end, which is guided by meta-classification loss on the selected pseudo-labeled target samples. Therefore, this network can fit a weighting function according to the cross-user WHAR task at hand, which is superior to existing sample differentiation rules fixed for special scenarios. Extensive experiments on three public WHAR datasets demonstrate that SWL-Adapt achieves the state-of-the-art performance on the cross-user WHAR task, outperforming the best baseline by an average of 3.1% and 5.3% in accuracy and macro F1 score, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25743

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cao, Z.; Ma, L.; Long, M.; and Wang, J. 2018. Partial ad- versarial domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 135-150.
  2. Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; and Peng, L. 2020. METIER: A deep multi-task learning based activity and user recognition model using wearable sensors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(1): 1-18.
  3. Hong, J.-H.; Ramos, J.; and Dey, A. K. 2016. Toward per- sonalized activity recognition systems with a semipopula- tion approach. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Sys- tems, 46(1): 101-112.
  4. Liu, S.; Yao, S.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, T.; Shao, H.; and Ab- delzaher, T. 2020. GIobalFusion: A global attentional deep learning framework for multisensor information fusion. Pro- ceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 4(1): 1-27.
  5. Long, M.; Zhu, H.; Wang, J.; and Jordan, M. I. 2017. Deep transfer learning with joint adaptation networks. In Proceed- ings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2208-2217.
  6. Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Massa, F.; Lerer, A.; Bradbury, J.; Chanan, G.; Killeen, T.; Lin, Z.; Gimelshein, N.; Antiga, L.; et al. 2019. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 8026-8037.
  7. You, K.; Wang, X.; and Jordan, M. I. 2019. Towards ac- curate model selection in deep unsupervised domain adap- tation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 7124-7133.
  8. Zhang, J.; Ding, Z.; Li, W.; and Ogunbona, P. 2018. Impor- tance weighted adversarial nets for partial domain adapta- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8156-8164.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, R., Chen, L., Miao, S., & Tang, X.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
6012-6020
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4382239371
Cited by
44
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
7.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB0505000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
unsupervised domain adaptation, pseudo-labeling, meta-optimization, annotated data scarcity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review