PreprintCited by 4,505Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networks

Open access
Long, Mingsheng, Cao, Yue, Wang, Jianmin, Jordan, Michael I.·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Recent studies reveal that a deep neural network can learn transferable features which generalize well to novel tasks for domain adaptation. However, as deep features eventually transition from general to specific along the network, the feature transferability drops significantly in higher layers with increasing domain discrepancy. Hence, it is important to formally reduce the dataset bias and enhance the transferability in task-specific layers. In this paper, we propose a new Deep Adaptation Network (DAN) architecture, which generalizes deep convolutional neural network to the domain adaptation scenario. In DAN, hidden representations of all task-specific layers are embedded in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space where the mean embeddings of different domain distributions can be explicitly matched. The domain discrepancy is further reduced using an optimal multi-kernel selection method for mean embedding matching. DAN can learn transferable features with statistical guarantees, and can scale linearly by unbiased estimate of kernel embedding. Extensive empirical evidence shows that the proposed architecture yields state-of-the-art image classification error rates on standard domain adaptation benchmarks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1502.02791

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Discrepancy-based methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces.

    “Discrepancybased methods measure the feature distance between source and target domain by calculating pre-defined statistical metrics, in order to align their feature spaces [65], [66], [67].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ajakan, H., Germain, P., Larochelle, H., Laviolette, F., and Marchand, M. Domain-adversarial neural networks. In NIPS 2014 Workshop on Transfer and Multi-task learning: Theory Meets Practice , 2014.
  2. Baktashmotlagh, M., Harandi, M. T., Lovell, B. C., and Salzmann, M. Unsupervised domain adaptation by domain invariant projection. In ICCV , 2013.
  3. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., and Pereira, F. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. NIPS , 2007.
  4. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., and Vaughan, J. W. A theory of learning from different domains. Machine Learning , 79(1-2):151-175, 2010.
  5. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., and Vincent, P. Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 35(8):1798-1828, 2013.
  6. Chen, M., Xu, Z., Weinberger, K. Q., and Sha, F. Marginalized denoising autoencoders for domain adaptation. In ICML , 2012.
  7. Ge, L., Gao, J., Li, X., and Zhang, A. Multi-source deep learning for information trustworthiness estimation. In KDD , 2013.
  8. Ghifary, M., Kleijn, W. B., and Zhang, M. Domain adaptive neural networks for object recognition. Technical report, arXiv:1409.6041, 2014. · arXiv
  9. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach. In ICML , 2011.
  10. Gong, B., Shi, Y., Sha, F., and Grauman, K. Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In CVPR , 2012.
  11. Gong, B., Grauman, K., and Sha, F. Connecting the dots with landmarks: Discriminatively learning domain-invariant features for unsupervised domain adaptation. In ICML , 2013.
  12. Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K., Rasch, M., Sch¨ olkopf, B., and S mola, A. A kernel two-sample test. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 13:723-773, March 2012a.
  13. Gretton, A., Sriperumbudur, B., Sejdinovic, D., Strathmann, H., Balakrishnan, S., Pontil, M., and Fukumizu, K. Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests. In NIPS , 2012b.
  14. Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. Technical report, arXiv:1207.0580, 2012. · arXiv
  15. Hoffman, J., Guadarrama, S., Tzeng, E., Hu, R., Donahue, J., Girshick, R., Darrell, T., and Saenko, K. LSDA: Large scale detection through adaptation. In NIPS , 2014.
  16. Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., and Darrell, T. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In ACM Multimedia , 2014.
  17. Long, M., Wang, J., Ding, G., Sun, J., and Yu, P. S. Transfer feature learning with joint distribution adaptation. In ICCV , 2013.
  18. Ngiam, J., Khosla, A., Kim, M., Nam, J., Lee, H., and Ng, A. Y. Multimodal deep learning. In ICML , 2011.
  19. Pan, S. J., Tsang, I. W., Kwok, J. T., and Yang, Q. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 22(2):199-210, 2011.
  20. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A. C., and Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Technical report, arXiv:1409.0575, 2014. · arXiv
  21. Sriperumbudur, B. K., Fukumizu, K., Gretton, A., Lanckriet, G., and Sch¨ olkopf, B. Kernel choice and classifiability for rkh s embeddings of probability distributions. In NIPS , 2009.
  22. Wang, X. and Schneider, J. Flexible transfer learning under support and model shift. In NIPS , 2014.
  23. Weston, J., Rattle, F., and Collobert, R. Deep learning via semisupervised embedding. In ICML , 2008.
  24. Zhang, K., Sch¨ olkopf, B., Muandet, K., and Wang, Z. Domain adaptation under target and conditional shift. In ICML , 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, M., Cao, Y., Wang, J., & Jordan, M. I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159291411
Cited by
4,505
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 552 · 2023: 649 · 2022: 564 · 2021: 833 · 2020: 652 · 2019: 477 · 2018: 263 · 2017: 147 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
domain adaptation, transferable features, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, kernel embedding, domain discrepancy, image classification, convolutional neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review