The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?
Open accessAbstract
Recently, there has been a surge of Transformer-based solutions for the long-term time series forecasting (LTSF) task. Despite the growing performance over the past few years, we question the validity of this line of research in this work. Specifically, Transformers is arguably the most successful solution to extract the semantic correlations among the elements in a long sequence. However, in time series modeling, we are to extract the temporal relations in an ordered set of continuous points. While employing positional encoding and using tokens to embed sub-series in Transformers facilitate preserving some ordering information, the nature of the permutation-invariant self-attention mechanism inevitably results in temporal information loss. To validate our claim, we introduce a set of embarrassingly simple one-layer linear models named LTSF-Linear for comparison. Experimental results on nine real-life datasets show that LTSF-Linear surprisingly outperforms existing sophisticated Transformer-based LTSF models in all cases, and often by a large margin. Moreover, we conduct comprehensive empirical studies to explore the impacts of various design elements of LTSF models on their temporal relation extraction capability. We hope this surprising finding opens up new research directions for the LTSF task. We also advocate revisiting the validity of Transformer-based solutions for other time series analysis tasks (e.g., anomaly detection) in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploiting Generative AI to Scale up Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., Kaliszyk, C., Olšák, M., Piotrowski, B., Schulz, S., Suda, M., & Urban, J. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,658
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting
Zhou, H., Zhang, S., Peng, J., Zhang, S., Li, J., Xiong, H., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i12.17325 · Cited by 7,752
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling
Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.01271 · Cited by 4,655
DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks
Salinas, D., Flunkert, V., Gasthaus, J., & Januschowski, T. (2020) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001 · Cited by 2,661
STL : A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess
Cleveland, R. B. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,244
Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networks
Lai, G., Chang, W.-C., Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018) · The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3209978.3210006 · Cited by 2,152
Cited by
Transformers in Time Series: A Survey
Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C., Chen, W., Ma, Z., Yan, J., & Sun, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/759 · Cited by 1,260
Is Mamba effective for time series forecasting?
Wang, Z., Kong, F., Feng, S., Wang, M., Yang, X., Zhao, H., Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129178 · Cited by 284
LLM4TS: Aligning Pre-Trained LLMs as Data-Efficient Time-Series Forecasters
Chang, C., Wang, W.-Y., Peng, W.-C., & Chen, T.-F. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08469 · Cited by 146
UniTime: A Language-Empowered Unified Model for Cross-Domain Time Series Forecasting
Liu, X., Hu, J., Li, Y., Diao, S., Liang, Y., Hooi, B., & Zimmermann, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645434 · Cited by 115
Generative AI for self-adaptive systems: State of the art and research roadmap
Li, J., Zhang, M., Li, N., Weyns, D., Jin, Z., & Tei, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/3686803 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, A., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Xu, Q.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-06-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 11121-11128
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W4382203079
- Cited by
- 3,320
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 733.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26317
- The paper
- Zeng, A., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Xu, Q. (2023). Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
