Are There Gender Differences in Professional Self-Promotion? An Empirical Case Study of LinkedIn Profiles Among Recent MBA Graduates
Open accessAbstract
Women are more modest than men in expressing accomplishments, referred to as the “feminine modesty effect”. Given the importance of highlighting accomplishments and skills for professional advancement, our research revisits the classical question of equal opportunity with a modern dataset to examine how women leverage LinkedIn, a professional social networking site. We first apply propensity score matching methods to identify a subset of similarly qualified female and male U.S. users who recently graduated/will be graduating (2011-2017) from a top-ranked MBA program as indicated on their LinkedIn profile. We then analyze gender differences in online self-promotion choices, an often overlooked aspect of understanding the role of gender in the professional hiring pipeline. Among matched subsets of female and male users, we find that females are less likely relative to males to utilize data fields that require writing in free-form such as the Summary and Job Description fields. However, we find for most universities that females and males are equally likely to include more structured data fields such as Honors and Skills, and for some universities females are more likely to include at least one Skill. This work begins to quantify gender biases in user-provided data and introduces important considerations for how self-presentation choices affect professional opportunity in online hiring platforms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-promotion gaps related to gender have been documented in the hiring domain and beyond.
“Self-promotion gaps related to gender have been documented in the hiring domain [5] and beyond; men tend to self-evaluate higher than women even without intrinsic incentives [87].”
From Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We apply traditional statistical matching tools for quasiexperimental design, propensity score matching (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1983), to identify similarly qualified female and male users on the LinkedIn platform and then examine potential gender differences in self-promotion.”
MethodRosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1985) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2683903 · Cited by 6,854 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Note that a caliper (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1985; Althauser and Rubin 1970) is defined as a permissible difference between female and male users to still be considered a match.”
BackgroundSocial media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 · Cited by 4,970 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The recent explosion of diverse online social networking platforms provides users an unprecedented opportunity to express themselves, share information, engage each other and communicate directly with organizations (Kietzmann et al. 2011).”
Background<b>MatchIt</b> : Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08 · Cited by 4,385 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We implement these matching models with the R MatchIt package, version 2.4-21 (Ho et al. 2007).”
MethodInfluentialRudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the professional setting, self-presentation strategies are critical to career advancement (Rudman 1998).”
BackgroundMatching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
Rubin, D., & Thomas, N. (1996) · Biometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810725.024 · Cited by 1,445 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We follow practical recommendations and best practices for matching discussed in (Rubin and Thomas 1996; Rubin 2006).”
MethodRubin, D. B. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2739 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference
Ernst, M. (2004) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/088342304000000396 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Changing Faces: Professional Image Construction In Diverse Organizational Settings
Roberts, L. M. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378873 · Cited by 589 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There are numerous studies specifically analyzing offline self-presentation in professional settings (Giacalone and Rosenfeld 2013; Roberts 2005), though research is only beginning to unravel how self-presentation translates to online professional settings (Haferkamp et al. 2012; Sievers et al.…”
BackgroundImpression management in the organization.
Giacalone, R., & Rosenfeld, P. (1989) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203763018 · Cited by 533 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There are numerous studies specifically analyzing offline self-presentation in professional settings (Giacalone and Rosenfeld 2013; Roberts 2005), though research is only beginning to unravel how self-presentation translates to online professional settings (Haferkamp et al. 2012; Sievers et al.…”
BackgroundMatched Sampling for Causal Effects
Wade, A. (2008) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00538_9.x · Cited by 435 · cited 1×
“We follow practical recommendations and best practices for matching discussed in (Rubin and Thomas 1996; Rubin 2006).”
MethodHaferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A.-M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0151 · Cited by 378 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…are numerous studies specifically analyzing offline self-presentation in professional settings (Giacalone and Rosenfeld 2013; Roberts 2005), though research is only beginning to unravel how self-presentation translates to online professional settings (Haferkamp et al. 2012; Sievers et al. 2015).”
BackgroundMen Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time
King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D. (2017) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023117738903 · Cited by 275 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While previous efforts have examined self-promotion in other settings including scholarly self-citations (King et al. 2016), this work evaluates gender differences in self-promotion on a professional social networking site.”
BackgroundSelf-presentation and hiring recommendations in online communities: Lessons from LinkedIn
Chiang, J. K.-H., & Suen, H.-Y. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.017 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Causal Effects of Perceived Immutable Characteristics
Greiner, D., & Rubin, D. (2011) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00110 · Cited by 143 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As explained in more detail in (Greiner and Rubin 2011; Holland 2003), a causal inquiry of the effect of a personal attribute like race or gender would mean randomizing these attributes at conception in order to truly quantify the effect of gender and control for all post-treatment variables.”
BackgroundHolland, P. (2003) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01895.x · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As explained in more detail in (Greiner and Rubin 2011; Holland 2003), a causal inquiry of the effect of a personal attribute like race or gender would mean randomizing these attributes at conception in order to truly quantify the effect of gender and control for all post-treatment variables.”
BackgroundGender, Productivity, and Prestige in Computer Science Faculty Hiring Networks
Way, S. F., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. J. (2016) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2872427.2883073 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(Bertrand and Mullainathan 2004), the effect of perceived gender on social media influence (Nilizadeh et al. 2016), differences in self-disclosure rates on Facebook (Wang, Burke, and Kraut 2016), and an analysis of gender bias in computer science faculty hiring (Way, Larremore, and Clauset 2016).”
BackgroundThe Computerized Construction of a Matched Sample
Althauser, R., & Rubin, D. (1970) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/224936 · Cited by 80 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Note that a caliper (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1985; Althauser and Rubin 1970) is defined as a permissible difference between female and male users to still be considered a match.”
BackgroundTwitter's Glass Ceiling: The Effect of Perceived Gender on Online Visibility
Nilizadeh, S., Groggel, A., Lista, P., Das, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Kapadia, A., & Rojas, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14711 · Cited by 48 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This analysis of online self-presentation contributes to the rapidly developing literature documenting gender bias in the professional and social marketplaces such as differences in callback rates when randomizing the gender of a name on a resume (Bertrand and Mullainathan 2004), the effect of perceived gender on soci…”
BackgroundSelf-presentation in professional networks: More than just window dressing
Sievers, K., Wodzicki, K., Aberle, I., Keckeisen, M., & Creß, U. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.046 · Cited by 42 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…are numerous studies specifically analyzing offline self-presentation in professional settings (Giacalone and Rosenfeld 2013; Roberts 2005), though research is only beginning to unravel how self-presentation translates to online professional settings (Haferkamp et al. 2012; Sievers et al. 2015).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S. 2004. Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? a field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Re- view 94(4):991-1013.
- Ho, D.; Imai, K.; King, G.; and Stuart, E. 2007. Matchit: Nonparametric preprocessing for paramet- ric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit.
- Wang, Y.-C.; Burke, M.; and Kraut, R. 2016. Modeling self- disclosure in social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 74-85. ACM.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting
De-Arteaga, M., Romanov, A., Wallach, H., Chayes, J., Borgs, C., Chouldechova, A., Geyik, S., Kenthapadi, K., & Kalai, A. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287572 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
“[2] analyzed self-promotion in LinkedIn, finding that women are more modest than men in expressing accomplishments and are less likely to use free-form fields.”
BackgroundReducing disparate exposure in ranking: A learning to rank approach
Zehlike, M., & Castillo, C. (2020) · Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 · doi:10.1145/3366424.3380048 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“ird, there can be systematic dierences in the way in which documents are constructed, as in the case of dierent sections in online resumes, which are completed at dierent rates by men and women [2]; these dierences may systematically aect ranking algorithms.”
BackgroundInformation Processing and Management
Zehlike, M., Sühr, T., Baeza-Yates, R., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., & Hajian, S. (n.d.) · doi:10.1241/johokanri.27.905 · Cited by 126
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3696457 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Gender differences in participation and reward on Stack Overflow
May, A., Wachs, J., & Hannák, A. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09685-x · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“Similar to previous findings on LinkedIn [2], we find that men are significantly more likely to fill out their biography, to link to their Github, LinkedIn, Twitter, or personal websites on Stack Overflow.”
ResultFairness and Transparency in Ranking
Castillo, C. (2019) · BIRDS@SIGIR · doi:10.1145/3308774.3308783 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“, tendency to click on results of a certain kind), and biases in the corpus itself (such as different sections of resumes completed at different rates by men and women [1]).”
BackgroundFairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Results
Zehlike, M., Sühr, T., Castillo, C., & Kitanovski, I. (2018) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3366424.3383534 · Cited by 80
“Third, there can be systematic discrepancies in the way in which documents are constructed, as in the case of certain sections in online resumes, which are completed differently by men and women [1]; these discrepancies may in turn systematically affect ranking algorithms.”
BackgroundRank aggregation algorithms for fair consensus
Kuhlman, C., & Rundensteiner, E. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3407790.3407855 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Young, E., Wajcman, J., & Sprejer, L. (2023) · New technology, work and employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12278 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Analysing global professional gender gaps using LinkedIn advertising data
Kashyap, R., & Verkroost, F. C. J. (2021) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00294-7 · Cited by 40
Kwong, C., Cheung, C. W. M., Bhattarai, C., & Fieldhouse, S. (2022) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2022.2055319 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Entrepreneurial identity was measured by the number of students, graduates and alumni who classified themselves as entrepreneurs on the LinkedIn database, adjusted for student number following the precedent of prior studies (Christofides, Muise, and Desmarais 2009) because disclosure as self-promotion indicates a posi…”
MethodGender Differences in the Global Music Industry: Evidence from MusicBrainz and The Echo Nest
Wang, Y.-X., & Horvát, E.-Á. (2019) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3249 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Gender effects and musical expression are thus exceptionally hard to untangle, making the problem more severe here than in other creative fields or mundane settings that have been studied before (Lutter 2015; Altenburger et al. 2017; Wachs et al. 2017; Altenburger and Ugander 2018).”
BackgroundSignals Matter: Understanding Popularity and Impact of Users on Stack Overflow
Merchant, A., Shah, D., Bhatia, G., Ghosh, A., & Kumaraguru, P. (2019) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313583 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“that may explain why they may be better known [1].”
BackgroundProfessional Gender Gaps Across US Cities
Haranko, K., Zagheni, E., Garimella, K., & Weber, I. (2018) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15064 · Cited by 23
“Altenburger et al. (2017) analyzed gender differences in self-promotion choices on LinkedIn profiles.”
Utilizing data driven methods to identify gender bias in LinkedIn profiles
Simon, V., Rabin, N., & Gal, H. C. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103423 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media
Peng, H., Teplitskiy, M., Romero, D. M., & Horvát, E.-Á. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring
Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Borgesius, F. Z., & Biega, A. J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.13933 · Cited by 16
Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in Ranking
Li, J., Moskovitch, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00168 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Women who LinkedIn: The Gender Networking Gap Among Executives
Contreras, G., de Cabo, R. M., & Gimeno, R. (2024) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.003 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Yuan, Y.-H., Yeh, Y.-C., Wu, C.-H., Liu, C.-Y., Chen, H.-H., & Chen, C.-W. (2022) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.287105 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
From Asking to Answering: Getting More Involved on Stack OverflowPreprint
Bachschi, T., Hannák, A., Lemmerich, F., & Wachs, J. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04025 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Understanding the Dynamics between Vaping and Cannabis Legalization Using Twitter Opinions
Adhikari, S., Uppal, A., Mermelstein, R., Berger-Wolf, T., & Zheleva, E. (2021) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18037 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Matching methods have been used in answering public health and socio-economic questions using social media data (Dos Reis and Culotta 2015; De Choudhury and Kıcıman 2017; Altenburger et al. 2017; Park et al. 2020).”
MethodGender Gaps in Online Social Connectivity, Promotion and Relocation Reports on LinkedIn
Kalhor, G., Gardner, H., Weber, I., & Kashyap, R. (2023) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.13296 · Cited by 8
“find that female MBA graduates are less likely to use freeform data fields on their profiles (such as the Summary and Job Description fields) but are just as likely to include structured fields (such as Honours and Skills) (Altenburger et al. 2017).”
BackgroundKaljo, K., Ngui, E. M., Treat, R. W., & Rader, J. S. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-021-02127-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Scholars create a LinkedIn professional networking account to encourage self-promotion and confidence to network [15].”
BackgroundWhat Predicts Engagement on LinkedIn? Engagement-Boosting Strategies for Professionals
Usera, D., & Durham, N. (2025) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906251336710 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ahuja, K. K. (2024) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-024-00176-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The findings of the present study are further substantiated by previous work (e.g., [4]) who also found that women relative to men are less likely to utilize data fields that require writing in free-form such as the Summary.”
InfluentialWho Is Bragging More Online? A Large Scale Analysis of Bragging in Social Media
Jin, M., Preoctiuc-Pietro, D., Doğruöz, A. S., & Aletras, N. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.16668 · Cited by 4
Self Promotion in US Congressional Tweets
Jun, W., Cui, K., & Yu, B. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.388 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“, 2002); women MBA graduates were less likely to utilize free-form data fields to promote themselves in their LinkedIn profiles (Altenburger et al., 2017); and women researchers made fewer self-citations than men (King et al.”
BackgroundPena, L., Oliveira, M., & Curado, C. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness · doi:10.1108/joepp-01-2025-0004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Business-Oriented Social Network as a Platform for Personal Promotion
Milošević, I., Arsić, S., Rakić, A., & Ruso, J. (2023) · Management Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies · doi:10.7595/management.fon.2022.0014 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fair Top-k Ranking with multiple protected groups
Zehlike, M., Sühr, T., Baeza-Yates, R., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., & Hajian, S. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102707 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Utility of Social Media in Understanding the Future of Work
Mahdavimoghaddam, J. (2022) · CSCW Companion · doi:10.1145/3500868.3561397 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In regards to RO2 , and to estimate the effect of users’ demo-graphics on their emotions, a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method will be conducted while adjusting for the influences of the confounding variables [1].”
MethodRevisiting the glass ceiling in early management careers
Perales, R. M. Y., Chordà, I. M., & Pérez-Ledo, P. (2026) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-03-2025-0736 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
What Users Post and Engage With on LinkedIn: A Mixed Methods Study
Usera, D., Cox, S., & Walker, L. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261428891 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Other studies have focused on the structure and content of LinkedIn profiles, such as their influence on hiring potential, personality assessments, and professional branding (Altenburger et al., 2017; Fernandez et al., 2021).”
Zargari, H., Elmalech, A., & Rosenfeld, A. (2025) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2025.2509579 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Various platforms were specifically created for different types of self-presentation-such as LinkedIn and digital résumés for professional self-branding, Facebook for personal self-branding and self-expression (Van Dijck 2013), and dating apps in search of partners (Ranzini and Lutz 2017).”
InfluentialWomen Leading in the Third space
Ngo, L., Cook, H., Tyrell, S., Cosgrove, K., & Addanki, K. (2024) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2024.1399 · Cited by 1
Akintola, O., Nawaz, I., & Obasan, O. (2026) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2026.2718230
Armutlu, İ. İ. (2026) · OPUS Journal of Society Research · doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1934794
A Social Media Lens on the Needs and Concerns of Information Workers
Mahdavimoghaddam, J., Saha, K., Hui, J., Dillahunt, T. R., & Bagheri, E. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3811241
“…earlier works that utilized a lexicon to identify the psycholinguistic characteristics of social media language [144, 158, 186], we used the well-validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2022 (LIWC-22) lexicon [17] to understand how information workers express their psychological well-being.”
Vargas-Solar, G. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.18558
“We identify skills reported in professional platforms/social networks and classify profiles concerning these skills [5, 53, 61], of course, classified by gender and academia vs industry.”
The Resume Paradox: Greater Language Differences, Smaller Pay Gaps
Minot, J., Maier, M., Demarest, B., Cheney, N., Danforth, C., Dodds, P., & Frank, M. R. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.08580
“As a more specific example, resumes for female MBA students were less likely than their male counterparts to fill in free-text summary and job description fields [22].”
- Authors
- Altenburger, K., De, R., Frazier, K., Avteniev, N., & Hamilton, J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- LinkedIn (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Altenburger, Kristen
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2017-05-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 460-463
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2620600535
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- gender differences, self-promotion, LinkedIn profiles, MBA graduates, professional social networking, online self-presentation, gender bias in hiring, equal opportunities, career development, user-generated data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review