The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy
Open accessAbstract
Directed links in social media could represent anything from intimate friendships to common interests, or even a passion for breaking news or celebrity gossip. Such directed links determine the flow of information and hence indicate a user's influence on others — a concept that is crucial in sociology and viral marketing. In this paper, using a large amount of data collected from Twitter, we present an in-depth comparison of three measures of influence: indegree, retweets, and mentions. Based on these measures, we investigate the dynamics of user influence across topics and time. We make several interesting observations. First, popular users who have high indegree are not necessarily influential in terms of spawning retweets or mentions. Second, most influential users can hold significant influence over a variety of topics. Third, influence is not gained spontaneously or accidentally, but through concerted effort such as limiting tweets to a single topic. We believe that these findings provide new insights for viral marketing and suggest that topological measures such as indegree alone reveals very little about the influence of a user.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“artificially inflating the number of followers can also be finalized to make an account more trustworthy and influential, in order to stand from the crowd and to attract other genuine followers [5].”
From Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers (2015) · cites this paper as [5]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Linking biases impact the study of, e.g., social networks structure and evolution, social influence, and information diffusion phenomena”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Cha et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Different graph construction methods can lead to different structural graph properties in the various kinds of networks that can be constructed from social data”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Cha et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491 · cited 1×
“Furthermore , because of the tight connection between users as suggested in the triadic closure (Granovetter 1973), retweeting in a social network can serve as a powerful tool to reinforce a message—for instance, the probability of adopting an innovation increases when not one but a group of users…”
BackgroundRogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Stanton, B. F., & Rogers, E. M. (1963) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1235767 · Cited by 6,726
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data
Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07634 · Cited by 4,295 · cited 1×
“Google similarly normalizes the data when analyzing their search trends (Ginsberg et al. 2009).”
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference
Meadows-Klue, D. (2004) · Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1057/palgrave.im.4340262 · Cited by 3,064 · cited 3×
“The notion of influence plays a vital role in how businesses operate and how a society functions—for instance, see observations on how fashion spreads (Gladwell 2002) and how people vote (Berry and Keller 2003).”
Mining the network value of customers
Domingos, P., & Richardson, M. (2001) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/502512.502525 · Cited by 2,884 · cited 2×
“Instead, it posits that the key factors determining influence are (i) the interpersonal relationship among ordinary users and (ii) the readiness of a society to adopt an innovation (Watts and Dodds 2007; Domingos and Richardson 2001).”
BackgroundPersonal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Willigan, W. L., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708755 · Cited by 2,173
The dynamics of viral marketing
Leskovec, J., Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2007) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/1232722.1232727 · Cited by 2,065
Book Review: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Roshwalb, I., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247718 · Cited by 1,900
Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation
Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/518527 · Cited by 1,864
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Levy, M., and Windhal, S. 1985. Media Gratications Research, Chapter The Concept of Audience Activity. Sage.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,007
Understanding the relationship among resources, social media use and hotel performance
Kim, W., & Chae, B. K. (2018) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-02-2017-0085 · Cited by 83
How Does Social Capital Affect Retweets?
Recuero, R., Araújo, R., & Zago, G. D. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14115 · Cited by 75
“Timing is related to making information quickly accessible - the earlier the information reaches someone the more value this person can get from it.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRecuero, R., Soares, F. B., & Gruzd, A. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7324 · Cited by 84
“We used indegree centrality as a measure of influence in the network because it is based on the number of retweets, replies and mentions one receives in the conversation (Cha et al., 2010).”
MethodBodaghi, A., & Oliveira, J. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116110 · Cited by 78
Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects
An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2014) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2566486.2568005 · Cited by 79
“The Twitterderived features are widely-used to measure activity, status [16], and influence [5], and they are three: 1) the logarithm of the total number of tweets (activity); 2) the logarithm of the total number of followers divided by the number of followees (status); and 3) the sum of the average number of retweets…”
BackgroundBošnjak, M., Oliveira, E., Martins, J., Rodrigues, E. M., & Sarmento, L. (2012) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188266 · Cited by 74
“Cha et al. [4] studied influence on Twitter.”
BackgroundQuantifying Collective Attention from Tweet Stream
Sasahara, K., Hirata, Y., Toyoda, M., Kitsuregawa, M., & Aihara, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061823 · Cited by 74
Predicting and Characterising User Impact on Twitter
Lampos, V., Αλέτρας, Ν., Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., & Cohn, T. (2014) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/e14-1043 · Cited by 74
“2 Therefore, using solely the number of followers to quantify impact may lead to inaccurate outcomes (Cha et al., 2010).”
BackgroundStringhini, G., Egele, M., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2342549.2342551 · Cited by 74
Rieder, B., Abdulla, R. A., Poell, T., Woltering, R. A. F. L., & Zack, L. (2015) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715614980 · Cited by 75
“…(Shaw et al., 2013); second , there have been studies trying to profile overall platform characteristics, often working with complete data-sets (e.g. Cha et al., 2010; Prieur et al., 2008) or representative samples (e.g. Gerlitz and Rieder, 2013); third , a considerable number of researchers,…”
BackgroundRumor detection in Arabic tweets using semi-supervised and unsupervised expectation–maximization
Alzanin, S. M., & Azmi, A. M. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.104945 · Cited by 75
Lynn, T., Rosati, P., Santos, G. L., & Endo, P. T. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228557 · Cited by 86
“Early studies regarding influence on Twitter suggested that the most active and the most visible users may indicate influence on Twitter [73].”
BackgroundThe influence of trust and relationship commitment to vloggers on viewers' purchase intention
Chen, Y., Liu, M. T., Liu, Y., Chang, A., & Yen, J. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-08-2020-0626 · Cited by 84
Misinformation in Online Social Networks
Zhang, H., Alim, M. A., Li, X. R., Thai, M. T., & Nguyen, H. P. N. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2885494 · Cited by 74
“The Twitter dataset is extracted by unbiased sampling [Cha et al. 2010].”
MethodAbedin, B., & Babar, A. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9789-4 · Cited by 81
“This is consistent with findings of other studies, as for example Cha et al. (2010) found that a high percentage of re-tweeting of tweets is an indicator of the level of influence of the users (who posted the messages) on their followers.”
Zhao, X., Zhan, M. M., & Liu, B. F. (2018) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.08.002 · Cited by 73
Detecting Events in Online Social Networks: Definitions, Trends and Challenges
Παναγιώτου, Ν., Katakis, I., & Gunopulos, D. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41706-6_2 · Cited by 73
“Marketing in particular found a perfect fit since now businesses are able to analyse a large volume of public data and identify trends [55], influ-ential profiles [18], experts [33] or to provide personalized advertisements and documents [20].”
BackgroundOnline analysis of information diffusion in twitter
Taxidou, I., & Fischer, P. M. (2014) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2567948.2580050 · Cited by 72
Crowdsourcing: a new tool for policy-making?
Taeihagh, A. (2017) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9303-3 · Cited by 78
“…the organisation on the platform, the number of followers and shares of content/calls made by the organisation and the popularity and stature of the crowds they engage (e.g. attention from celebrities, Nobel laureates), alongside the quality of the content posted (Cha et al. 2010; Taeihagh 2017a).”
BackgroundGetting the Lay of the Land in Discrete Space: A Survey of Metric Dimension and Its Applications
Tillquist, R. C., Frongillo, R., & Lladser, M. E. (2023) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/21m1409512 · Cited by 105
“Generic approximation algorithms tend to provide small resolving sets but do not scale well enough with network size to be useful on larger networks which routinely include more than 10(6) total nodes [14, 83, 108].”
BackgroundMaking Use of Derived Personality: The Case of Social Media Ad Targeting
Chen, J., Haber, E. M., Kang, R., Hsieh, G., & Mahmud, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14599 · Cited by 72
“The purpose of this two-phase design was to understand if users' responses would differ depending on whether they are followed, given prior evidences that some Twitter users would follow back their followers simply for etiquette (Cha et al. 2010).”
BackgroundT-Hoarder: A framework to process Twitter data streams
Congosto, M., Val, P. B., & Fernández, L. S. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.01.029 · Cited by 77
“From 2008, it is also a source of study by academic researchers [6] and it has been applied in a number of social fields such as elections [7] [8] [9], social movements [10], predictions [11] [12], user’s influence [13], behavior [14] [15], and message propagation analytics [16].”
BackgroundPolitical Discourse Among Key Twitter Users: The Case Of Sejong City In South Korea
Hsu, C.-L., Park, S. J., & Park, H. W. (2013) · Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia · doi:10.17477/jcea.2013.12.1.065 · Cited by 71
Where should one get news updates: Twitter or Reddit
Priya, S., Sequeira, R., Chandra, J., & Dandapat, S. K. (2018) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2018.11.001 · Cited by 71
The Impact of Geographic Distance on Online Social Interactions
Laniado, D., Volkovich, Y., Scellato, S., Cecilia Mascolo, C., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9784-9 · Cited by 71
“Even if in some online social services, such as Twitter, user behavior may appear more interest-driven than purely social (Kwak et al. 2010b; Cha et al. 2010), connections between online users represent rich source of information to understand these systems.”
BackgroundWang, X., Zhang, M., Fan, W., & Zhao, K. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24576 · Cited by 67
“Sharing information (e.g., retweeting) is a key feature provided by social media sites such as Twitter (Cha et al., 2010; Suh et al., 2010).”
Background#GazaUnderAttack: Twitter, Palestine and diffused war
Σιαπέρα, Ε., Hunt, G., & Lynn, T. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1070188 · Cited by 70
“Previous studies indicate that the quantity and speed of retweeting are a good measure for message virality and a screen-name’s influence (Cha et al., 2010; Hoang & Lim, 2012).”
BackgroundTopicality and Impact in Social Media: Diverse Messages, Focused Messengers
Weng, L., & Menczer, F. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118410 · Cited by 70
“The result confirms several existing studies suggesting that high social influence requires long-term, consistent effort [44, 45].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLee, K., Mahmud, J., Chen, J., Zhou, M. X., & Nichols, J. W. (2014) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/2557500.2557502 · Cited by 70
“widespread use of social media sites, like Twitter and Facebook, and the ever growing number of users, there has been much effort on understanding and modeling information propagation on social media [1, 2, 6, 14, 17, 25, 27, 29, 30]. Most of the work assumes that information is propagated by a small number of influen…”
BackgroundAdvertising to Early Trend Propagators: Evidence from Twitter
Lambrecht, A., Tucker, C. E., & Wiertz, C. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2017.1062 · Cited by 87
“This echoes work by Cha et al. (2010) who provide evidence that having a large number of Twitter followers is not that predictive of influence on Twitter.”
Influence and Passivity in Social MediaPreprint
Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1653135 · Cited by 70
Damaged corporate reputation: Can celebrity Tweets repair it?
Norel, N. D. V., Kommers, P., van Hoof, J. J., & Verhoeven, J. W. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.056 · Cited by 71
Bigger sociological imaginations: framing big social data theory and methods
Halavais, A. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008543 · Cited by 54
The Visual Vaccine Debate on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis
Milani, E., Weitkamp, E., & Webb, P. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.2847 · Cited by 69
Efficient Algorithms for Densest Subgraph Discovery on Large Directed Graphs
Ma, C., Fang, Y., Cheng, R. C. K., Lakshmanan, L. V. S., Zhang, W., & Lin, X. (2020) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3318464.3389697 · Cited by 74
“MO [21] Human Social 217 2,672 TC [2] Infrastructure 1,226 2,615 OF [42] Infrastructure 2,939 30,501 AD [38] Social 6,541 51,127 AM [35] E-commerce 403,394 3,387,388 AR [40] E-commerce 3,376,972 5,838,041 BA [41] Hyperlink 2,141,300 17,794,839 TW [9] Social 52,579,682 1,963,263,821”
Bots are Less Central than Verified Accounts during Contentious Political Events
González‐Bailón, S., & Domenico, M. D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2013443118 · Cited by 74
“, to trigger collective attention (9, 10), gain status (11, 12), and monetize public attention (13)] or with malicious intent [e.”
BackgroundNeutral bots probe political bias on social media
Chen, W., Pacheco, D. F., Yang, K.-C., & Menczer, F. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 68
Jain, S., & Sinha, A. (2020) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110037 · Cited by 68
Predicting susceptibility to social bots on Twitter
Wald, R., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Napolitano, A., & Sumner, C. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) · doi:10.1109/iri.2013.6642447 · Cited by 69
“These two competing aspects have led to increased focus on Twitter influence: how much one user can affect others [2], [8], [9], and how different user networks are connected to spread information [5], [35].”
BackgroundG-Tries: a data structure for storing and finding subgraphs
Ribeiro, P., & Silva, F. (2013) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-013-0303-4 · Cited by 68
Information-theoretic measures of influence based on content dynamics
Steeg, G. V., & Galstyan, A. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2433396.2433400 · Cited by 68
“For Twitter data, various influence measures include number of followers, mentions, retweets [4], Pagerank of follower network [20], size of the information cascades [2].”
BackgroundPartitioning Trillion-Edge Graphs in Minutes
Slota, G. M., Rajamanickam, S., Devine, K., & Madduri, K. (2017) · IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2017.95 · Cited by 68
“Table I lists the graphs used from the University of Florida Sparse Matrix Collection [3]– [5], [13], the 10th DIMACS Implementation Challenge web-site [1], the Stanford Network Analysis Platform (SNAP) website [23], [30], [35], the Koblenz Network Collection [22], and Cha et al. [9].”
MethodInfluencers in Polarized Political Networks on Twitter
Soares, F. B., Recuero, R., & Zago, G. D. S. (2018) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/3217804.3217909 · Cited by 80
“Many studies have discussed influencers on social media in general [1-5] and in the political context specifically [5].”
BackgroundInfluentialVirtual Zika transmission after the first U.S. case: who said what and how it spread on Twitter
Vijaykumar, S., Nowak, G. J., Himelboim, I., & Jin, Y. (2018) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.015 · Cited by 69
Follow the “Mastodon”: Structure and Evolution of a Decentralized Online Social Network
Zignani, M., Gaito, S., & Rossi, G. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14988 · Cited by 67
“The same has happened with Twitter, where the first massive studies (Cha et al. 2010; Kwak et al. 2010) have shown its nature not as a social network but as an information one.”
BackgroundSmall worlds with a difference
Jürgens, P., Jungherr, A. M., & Schoen, H. (2011) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/2527031.2527034 · Cited by 66
“While prior research focused on Twitter users who were highly influential in spreading information [8], [9], we focus on users who had the strongest possibility to block or disrupt the flow of information.”
BackgroundNeutral bots probe political bias on social media
Chen, W., Pacheco, D. F., Yang, K.-C., & Menczer, F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6 · Cited by 106
Mallipeddi, R. R., Janakiraman, R., Kumar, S., & Gupta, S. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0961 · Cited by 74
Liu, K., Zhou, J., & Dong, D. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100507 · Cited by 68
Linking cyber and physical spaces through community detection and clustering in social media feeds
Croitoru, A., Wayant, N. M., Crooks, A. T., Radzikowski, J., & Stefanidis, A. (2014) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.11.002 · Cited by 70
Influential user weighted sentiment analysis on topic based microblogging community
Eliaçik, A. B., & Erdoğan, N. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.006 · Cited by 66
A Comprehensive Study on Social Network Mental Disorders Detection via Online Social Media Mining
Shuai, H.-H., Shen, C.-Y., Yang, D.-N., Lan, Y.-F. C., Lee, W.-C., Yu, P. S., & Chen⋆, M.-S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2786695 · Cited by 67
“An influential user is the onewith a huge degree and many mentions and shares (retweets) [13].”
BackgroundCho, S. E., & Park, H. W. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0519-2 · Cited by 65
“Cha et al. (2010) stated that reciprocity (following-back action) often occurs not because of the social influence of the Twitter user but because of etiquette.”
BackgroundInfluencers in the Political Conversation on Twitter: Identifying Digital Authority with Big Data
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052851 · Cited by 73
Predicting iPhone Sales from iPhone Tweets
Lassen, N. B., Madsen, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2014) · IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) · doi:10.1109/edoc.2014.20 · Cited by 67
“Previous research has explored the differences between tweets, retweets and replies on Twitter [31, 32].”
BackgroundUnderstanding factors that affect response rates in twitter
Comarela, G., Crovella, M. E., Almeida, V. A. F., & Benevenuto, F. (2012) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/2309996.2310017 · Cited by 65
Self-citationSocial Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media
Yang, X., Chen, B.-C., Maity, M., & Ferrara, E. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_20 · Cited by 69
“The ability to communicate interesting political issues yields the opportunity to users to acquire more visibility and influence [2, 9, 43], although Twitter political discussion is plagued by a number of issues related to manipulation and abuse [21,22,45].”
Himelboim, I., & Golan, G. J. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119847516 · Cited by 65
“…Vliegenthart (2017), define influentials as “users with above average ability to stimulate retweets to their own messages” (p. 503), consistent with conceptualization of influencers based on impact on content distribution (Cha, Haddadi, Benevenuto, & Gummadi, 2010; Kwak, Lee, Park, & Moon, 2010).”
BackgroundSong, Y., Dai, X.-Y., & Wang, J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.086 · Cited by 64
Inferring Dynamic User Interests in Streams of Short Texts for User Clustering
Liang, S., Ren, Z., Zhao, Y., Ma, J., Yılmaz, E., & de Rijke, M. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3072606 · Cited by 66
“[11] investigate the dynamics of user influence across topics and time based on an in-depth comparison of three measures of influence: in-degree, retweets, and mentions.”
BackgroundReconstruction and analysis of Twitter conversation graphs
Cogan, P., Andrews, M., Bradonjić, M., Kennedy, W. S., Sala, A., & Tucci, G. H. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2392622.2392626 · Cited by 64
Topology-Based Recommendation of Users in Micro-Blogging Communities
Armentano, M. G., Godoy, D. L., & Amandi, A. (2012) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-012-1249-5 · Cited by 64
“comparison between in-degree, re-tweets and mentions as influence indicators([14]) concluded that the first is more related to user popularity.”
BackgroundWhat’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now!
Boutet, A., Kim, H., & Yoneki, E. (2013) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-013-0120-1 · Cited by 64
“Users generate a constant stream of online messages through social media to share and discuss their activities, status, opinions, ideas and interesting news stories; social media might be an effective means to examine trends and popularity in topics ranging from economic, social, environmental to political issues [1],…”
BackgroundShapiro, G. K., Surian, D., Dunn, A. G., Perry, R., & Kelaher, M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016869 · Cited by 64
Harnessing stakeholder input on Twitter: A case study of short breaks in Spanish tourist cities
Bigné, E., Oltra, E., & Andreu, L. (2019) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.013 · Cited by 56
Finding trendsetters in information networks
Sáez-Trumper, D., Comarela, G., Almeida, V. A. F., Baeza-Yates, R. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2012) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339691 · Cited by 63
“…information .ltering, retrieval models General Terms Algorithms, Design, Experimentation Keywords Information Networks, In.uence, Social Networks Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAssessing the reTweet proneness of tweets: predictive models for retweeting
Nesi, P., Pantaleo, G., Paoli, I., & Zaza, I. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-5865-0 · Cited by 62
“[13] have examined three types of influential users, performed in propagating popular news topics.”
BackgroundCrilley, R., Gillespie, M., Vidgen, B., & Willis, A. (2020) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220980692 · Cited by 63
“…is based on previous work in network science to characterize online communities, as well as insights about the long-tailed distribution of social media followership in general (Cha et al. 2010), and it is a novel application of established statistical procedures in this context (Fog 2007).”
Identifying the influential nodes in complex social networks using centrality-based approach
Ishfaq, U., Khan, H. U., & Iqbal, S. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.09.016 · Cited by 63
Park, M., & Chai, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294613 · Cited by 74
“A user’s network activity in social media means how each user influences the other users based on the number of Twitter users’ mentions and retweets [30].”
BackgroundInfluentialNepotistic relationships in Twitter and their impact on rank prestige algorithms
Gayo-Avello, D. (2013) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2013.06.003 · Cited by 64
“is, instead, key. With regards to [17] and [47] the behavior of the users (either retweets or mentions) is as important as the social graph or, as is the case of [17], it simply replaces it. Finally, [8] just made a point against the use of simplistic graph measures (indegree) as proxies for influence but did not make…”
BackgroundEfficient PageRank Tracking in Evolving Networks
Ohsaka, N., Maehara, T., & Kawarabayashi, K. (2015) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783297 · Cited by 63
“When an edge ( i, j ) is inserted to and/or removed from a network at time t , only the PPR scores of the vertices “around” vertices i and j are updated.”
BackgroundEvent Detection in Twitter Microblogging
Doulamis, N. D., Doulamis, A. D., Kokkinos, P. C., & Varvarigos, E. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2015.2489841 · Cited by 63
A New Method of Identifying Influential Users in the Micro-Blog Networks
Jianqiang, Z., Xiaolin, G., & Tian, F. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2672680 · Cited by 63
“The recall of the FansRank and RetweetInfluence show an upward trend with the increasing of k .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTheories for Influencer Identification in Complex Networks
Pei, S., Morone, F., & Makse, H. A. (2018) · Computational social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_8 · Cited by 63
“The highlighted route is the shortest path from i to j . c-d , Giant component G ( q ) of Twitter ( N = 469 , 014) and Mobile phone network in Mexico ( N = 1 .”
BackgroundInfluentialMartinčić-Ipšić, S., Močibob, E., & Perc, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181079 · Cited by 62
Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. (2019) · Place Branding and Public Diplomacy · doi:10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5 · Cited by 63
“” Clarke (2015) and Manor (2018b) similarly suggest that diplomacy should not be considered in binary terms—traditional or digital—as all diplomats are expected to incorporate digital tools in their traditional daily work.”
Razaque, A., Rizvi, S., Khan, M. J., Almiani, M., & Al-Rahayfeh, A. A. (2019) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.08.008 · Cited by 67
“In addition, it may contribute to a great increase or decrease in marketing, especially economic loss (Brock and Hommes, 1998; Duman and Huosheng, 2001; Cha et al., 2010).”
Harlow, S., & Benbrook, A. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1386705 · Cited by 60
“Twitter-specific studies have operationalized influence by calculating how often a user is mentioned or retweeted (Cha & Gummadi, 2010) or by considering expert content in the messages and social embeddedness in a local network (Dubois & Gaffney, 2014).”
BackgroundMultimodal Post Attentive Profiling for Influencer Marketing
Kim, S., Jiang, J., Nakada, M., Han, J., & Wang, W. W. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380052 · Cited by 69
“3380052 to promote brand awareness and advertise products to social networks of influencers [13, 17, 22, 31], who have ‘influence’ over a large number of followers [3, 4], since customers are often more likely to trust influencers’ recommendations than brands’ advertisements [5, 26, 31].”
BackgroundThe dynamic competitive recommendation algorithm in social network services
Yu, S. J. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.10.020 · Cited by 62
“performed a study on how influential people are related to the number of retweeted messages [4,5].”
BackgroundTwitter Informatics: Tracking and Understanding Public Reaction during the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic
Szomszor, M., Kostkova, P., & Louis, C. S. (2011) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2011.311 · Cited by 62
CMiner: Opinion Extraction and Summarization for Chinese Microblogs
Zhou, X., Wan, X., & Xiao, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2016.2541148 · Cited by 61
“Lastly, personal influence has been widely studied for online social networks [42], [43].”
BackgroundTwitter Deception and Influence: Issues of Identity, Slacktivism, and Puppetry
Cook, D. M., Waugh, B., Abdipanah, M., Hashemi, O., & Rahman, S. A. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · Cited by 62
Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., Cha, M., & Benevenuto, F. (2014) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2567948.2577013 · Cited by 61
“Figure 3 shows the CPU time for all methods across tweet files of increasing sizes, which are drawn from large tweet dataset in [6].”
MethodSelf-citation#Sponsoring the #FrenchOpen: An Examination of Social Media Buzz and Sentiment
Delia, E. B., & Armstrong, C. G. (2014) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2013-0257 · Cited by 61
Reputation‐based credibility analysis of Twitter social network users
Alrubaian, M., Al‐Qurishi, M., Al-Rakhami, M. S., Hassan, M. M., & Alamri, A. M. (2016) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.3873 · Cited by 61
“Based on several studies, retweets are considered to be one of the best indicators of user popularity from the quantitative perspective [14,23,28].”
BackgroundGu, L. L., Skierkowski, D., Florin, P. R., Friend, K. B., & Ye, Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.006 · Cited by 61
Entropy-based Classification of 'Retweeting' Activity on TwitterPreprint
Ghosh, R., Surachawala, T., & Lerman, K. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.0346 · Cited by 84
“Twitter has emerged as a critical factor in information dissemination, marketing [19], and influence discovery [9].”
BackgroundSilva, A., Guimarães, S., Meira, W., & Zaki, M. J. (2013) · Social Network Mining and Analysis · doi:10.1145/2501025.2501033 · Cited by 60
“many following relationships on Twitter do not lead to retweets [5], ProfileRank is able to identify only those relationships that induce information diffusion on the network.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFeature selection using Principal Component Analysis for massive retweet detection
Morchid, M., Dufour, R., Bousquet, P.-M., Linarès, G., & Torres‐Moreno, J. (2014) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.05.020 · Cited by 60
Rizoiu, M.-A., Graham, T., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., Ackland, R., & Xie, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15029 · Cited by 60
Volkova, S., & Jang, J. Y. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3184558.3188728 · Cited by 63
“These studies have resulted in important findings about the effect of misinformation spread [33], influence campaigns [2, 7], and social bots [38] within specific newsworthy events.”
BackgroundRetweet: A popular information diffusion mechanism – A survey paper
Firdaus, S. N., Ding, C., & Sadeghian, A. (2018) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2018.04.001 · Cited by 60
The Web of False Information: Rumors, Fake News, Hoaxes, Clickbait, and Various Other ShenanigansPreprint
Zannettou, S., Sirivianos, M., Blackburn, J., & Kourtellis, N. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.03461 · Cited by 60
“By analyzing 1.7B tweets, obtained from [51], they find that: 1) users that spread rumors and non-rumors have similar registration age and number of followers; 2) rumors have a clearly different writing style; 3) sentiment in news depends on the topic and not on the credibility of the post; and 4)…”
BackgroundMethodBots, Elections, and Social Media: A Brief Overview
Ferrara, E. (2020) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_6 · Cited by 66
“Social media have been widely portrayed as enablers of democracy [50,48,15,12,47].”
BackgroundElecciones Europeas 2014: Viralidad de los mensajes en Twitter
Congosto, M. (2015) · Redes Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.529 · Cited by 59
“…sobre los demás en Twitter no es algo que se consiga de forma puntual, requiere de un esfuerzo continuado y una alta implicación personal (Cha & Gummadi, 2010) y aunque las personas que son populares e influyentes tienen más probabilidad de influir en el futuro, no está garantizado que…”
Nip, J. Y. M., & Fu, K. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1104372 · Cited by 59
“Cha et al. (2010) suggested 1128 J. Y. M. NIP AND K.-W. FU that follower size was a measure of user popularity, retweet count a measure of the tweet’s content value, and mention count an indication of the name value of the user.”
BackgroundAnalyzing the Political Landscape of 2012 Korean Presidential Election in Twitter
Song, M., Kim, M., & Jeong, Y. (2014) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2014.20 · Cited by 71
Schelter, S., Ewen, S., Tzoumas, K., & Markl, V. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2505515.2505753 · Cited by 58
“We use three publicy available datasets for our experiments: a webgraph called Webbase(3) [5], which consists of 1,019,903,190 links between 115,657,290 webpages, a snapshot of Twitter’s social network(4) [10], which contains 1,963,263,821 follower links between 51,217,936 users and a dataset of 717,872,016 ratings th…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2010-05-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-17
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W1814023381
- Semantic Scholar
- 1ad8410d0ded269af4a0116d8b38842a7549f0ae
- Cited by
- 3,022
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 198 · 2018: 257 · 2017: 266 · 2016: 253 · 2015: 287 · 2014: 329 · 2013: 310 · 2012: 193
- FWCI
- 142.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- user influence, Twitter, influence measures, in-degree, retweets, mentions, directed links, viral marketing, information flow, topic dynamics, influential users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review