Cited by 6Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Basic elements of artificial intelligence tools in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma

Querzoli, Giulia, Veronesi, Giulia, Corti, Barbara, Nottegar, Alessia, Dika, Emi·2023·Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence has dramatically increased in the last years. Early diagnosis is of paramount importance in terms of prognosis. Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are being proposed for clinicians and pathologists as an adjunct support in the diagnostic process. We described herein an overview of the most important parameters that a potential AI tool should take into consideration in histopathology to evaluate a skin lesion. First of all, recognition of a melanocytic or non-melanocytic nature. Furthermore, melanocytic lesions should be stratified according to at least four parameters: silhouette and asymmetry; identification and spatial distribution of the cells; mitosis count; presence of ulceration. According to the number of parameters the AI tools might stratify the risk of CM and prioritize the pathologist's work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/critrevoncog.2023050220

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cutaneous melanoma, AI models must initially differentiate between melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions.

    “In the context of cutaneous melanoma, AI models must initially differentiate between melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions.”
  • For melanocytic lesions, evaluating silhouette and asymmetry, cellular distribution, mitotic count, and ulceration is essential to stratify risk and optimize pathologists' workloads.

    “For melanocytic lesions, it is essential to evaluate critical histopathological parameters—silhouette and asymmetry, cellular distribution, mitotic count, and ulceration—to stratify risk and optimize pathologists’ workloads (7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Querzoli, G., Veronesi, G., Corti, B., Nottegar, A., & Dika, E.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Querzoli, Giulia
Venue
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis
Publisher
Begell House
Published
2023
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
37-41
ISSN
0893-9675 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386903095
Cited by
6
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
cutaneous melanoma, artificial intelligence, melanoma diagnosis, histopathology, melanocytic lesions, non-melanocytic skin lesions, mitotic count, ulceration, risk stratification, computer-aided diagnosis
MeSH terms
Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Melanoma, Prognosis, Skin Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review