Cited by 289AI in cancer detectionCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

Whole-Slide Mitosis Detection in H&E Breast Histology Using PHH3 as a Reference to Train Distilled Stain-Invariant Convolutional Networks

Open access
Tellez, David, Balkenhol, Maschenka, Otte-Höller, Irene, van de Loo, Rob, Vogels, Rob, Bult, Peter, Wauters, Carla, Vreuls, Willem +5 more·2018·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Manual counting of mitotic tumor cells in tissue sections constitutes one of the strongest prognostic markers for breast cancer. This procedure, however, is time-consuming and error-prone. We developed a method to automatically detect mitotic figures in breast cancer tissue sections based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Application of CNNs to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained histological tissue sections is hampered by noisy and expensive reference standards established by pathologists, lack of generalization due to staining variation across laboratories, and high computational requirements needed to process gigapixel whole-slide images (WSIs). In this paper, we present a method to train and evaluate CNNs to specifically solve these issues in the context of mitosis detection in breast cancer WSIs. First, by combining image analysis of mitotic activity in phosphohistone-H3 restained slides and registration, we built a reference standard for mitosis detection in entire H&E WSIs requiring minimal manual annotation effort. Second, we designed a data augmentation strategy that creates diverse and realistic H&E stain variations by modifying H&E color channels directly. Using it during training combined with network ensembling resulted in a stain invariant mitosis detector. Third, we applied knowledge distillation to reduce the computational requirements of the mitosis detection ensemble with a negligible loss of performance. The system was trained in a single-center cohort and evaluated in an independent multicenter cohort from the cancer genome atlas on the three tasks of the tumor proliferation assessment challenge. We obtained a performance within the top three best methods for most of the tasks of the challenge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2018.2820199

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many specialized methods have been developed to handle stain variation in the context of digital histopathology.

    “Many specialized methods have been developed to handle stain variation in the context of digital histopathology.”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Tellez et al. (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tellez, D., Balkenhol, M., Otte-Höller, I., van de Loo, R., Vogels, R., Bult, P., Wauters, C., Vreuls, W., Mol, S., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J., & Ciompi, F.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2018-09
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
2126-2136
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2794616003
Cited by
288
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 3
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
mitosis detection, breast cancer, whole slide images, H&E staining, knowledge distillation, data augmentation, image registration, tumor cell proliferation, histopathology, convolutional neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review