Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clay calcination technology: state-of-the-art review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL

Open access
Hanein, Theodore, Thienel, Karl-Christian, Zunino, Franco, Marsh, Alastair T. M., Maier, Matthias, Wang, Bin, Canut, Mariana, Juenger, Maria C. G., Ben Haha, Mohsen, Avet, François, Parashar, Anuj, Al-Jaberi, Layth A., Almenares-Reyes, Roger S., Alujas-Diaz, Adrián, Scrivener, Karen L., Bernal, Susan A., Provis, John L., Sui, Tongbo, Bishnoi, Shashank, Martirena-Hernández, Fernando·2022·Materials and Structures

Abstract

The use of calcined clays as supplementary cementitious materials provides the opportunity to significantly reduce the cement industry’s carbon burden; however, use at a global scale requires a deep understanding of the extraction and processing of the clays to be used, which will uncover routes to optimise their reactivity. This will enable increased usage of calcined clays as cement replacements, further improving the sustainability of concretes produced with them. Existing technologies can be adopted to produce calcined clays at an industrial scale in many regions around the world. This paper, produced by RILEM TC 282-CCL on calcined clays as supplementary cementitious materials (working group 2), focuses on the production of calcined clays, presents an overview of clay mining, and assesses the current state of the art in clay calcination technology, covering the most relevant aspects from the clay deposit to the factory gate. The energetics and associated carbon footprint of the calcination process are also discussed, and an outlook on clay calcination is presented, discussing the technological advancements required to fulfil future global demand for this material in sustainable infrastructure development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1617/s11527-021-01807-6

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Metadata

Authors
Hanein, T., Thienel, K.-C., Zunino, F., Marsh, A. T. M., Maier, M., Wang, B., Canut, M., Juenger, M. C. G., Ben Haha, M., Avet, F., Parashar, A., Al-Jaberi, L. A., Almenares-Reyes, R. S., Alujas-Diaz, A., Scrivener, K. L., Bernal, S. A., Provis, J. L., Sui, T., Bishnoi, S., & Martirena-Hernández, F.
Venue
Materials and Structures
Published
2021-12-20
Volume
55
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0025-5432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1359-5997
  • 1871-6873
OpenAlex
W4200622450
Cited by
308
References
62
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clay calcination technology: state-of-the-art review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1617/s11527-021-01807-6
The paper
Hanein, T., Thienel, K.-C., Zunino, F., Marsh, A. T. M., Maier, M., Wang, B., Canut, M., Juenger, M. C. G., Ben Haha, M., Avet, F., Parashar, A., Al-Jaberi, L. A., Almenares-Reyes, R. S., Alujas-Diaz, A., Scrivener, K. L., Bernal, S. A., Provis, J. L., Sui, T., Bishnoi, S., & Martirena-Hernández, F. (2022). Clay calcination technology: state-of-the-art review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL. Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01807-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.