The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Neural Progenitors Improves Behavioral Deficit in Parkinsonian Rats
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) may potentially serve as a renewable source of cells for transplantation. In Parkinson's disease, hESC-derived dopaminergic (DA) neurons may replace the degenerated neurons in the brain. Here, we generated highly enriched cultures of neural progenitors from hESCs and grafted the progenitors into the striatum of Parkinsonian rats. The grafts survived for at least 12 weeks, the transplanted cells stopped proliferating, and teratomas were not observed. The grafted cells differentiated in vivo into DA neurons, though at a low prevalence similar to that observed following spontaneous differentiation in vitro. Transplanted rats exhibited a significant partial correction of D-amphetamine and apomorphine-induced rotational behavior, along with a significant improvement in stepping and placing non-pharmacological behavioral tests. While transplantation of uncommitted hESC-derived neural progenitors induced partial behavioral recovery, our data indicate that the host-lesioned striatum could not direct the transplanted neural progenitors to acquire a dopaminergic fate. Hence, induction of their differentiation toward a midbrain fate prior to transplantation is probably required for complete correction of behavioral deficit. Our observations encourage further developments for the potential use of hESCs in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease
Freed, C. R., Greene, P. E., Breeze, R. E., Tsai, W.-Y., DuMouchel, W., Kao, R., Dillon, S., Winfield, H., Culver, S., Trojanowski, J. Q., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103083441002 · Cited by 2,366
Cited by
A MicroRNA Feedback Circuit in Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
Kim, J., Inoue, K., Ishii, J., Vanti, W. B., Voronov, S. V., Murchison, E., Hannon, G., & Abeliovich, A. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140481 · Cited by 1,187
Teratomas from pluripotent stem cells: A clinical hurdle
Fong, C., Gauthaman, K., & Bongso, A. (2010) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.22775 · Cited by 222
Constructing and Deconstructing Stem Cell Models of Neurological Disease
Han, S. S. W., Williams, L. A., & Eggan, K. C. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.003 · Cited by 159
Members, E. W. E., Terron, A., Bal-Price, A., Paini, A., Monnet-Tschudi, F., Bennekou, S. H., Leist, M., & Schildknecht, S. (2018) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2133-4 · Cited by 124
Vallier, L., & Pedersen, R. A. (2005) · Stem Cell Reviews · doi:10.1385/scr:1:2:119 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben‐Hur, T., Idelson, M., Khaner, H., Pera, M., Reinhartz, E., Itzik, A., & Reubinoff, B. E.
- Venue
- STEM CELLS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1246-1255
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2013393348
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Neural Progenitors Improves Behavioral Deficit in Parkinsonian Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2004-0094
- The paper
- Ben‐Hur, T., Idelson, M., Khaner, H., Pera, M., Reinhartz, E., Itzik, A., & Reubinoff, B. E. (2004). Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Neural Progenitors Improves Behavioral Deficit in Parkinsonian Rats. STEM CELLS. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2004-0094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.