The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells
Abstract
Nanog is a critical homeodomain factor responsible for maintaining embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Of interest, Nanog expression is not homogeneous in the conventional culture of murine ES cells. A Nanog-high population expresses markers for pluripotent ES cells, whereas a Nanog-low population expresses markers for primitive endoderm, such as Gata6. Since the inner cell mass of early blastocysts has recently been reported to be heterogeneous in terms of Nanog and Gata6 expression, ES cells appear to closely resemble the developing stage from which they originate. We further demonstrate that Nanog can directly repress Gata6 expression through its binding to the proximal promoter region of the Gata6 gene and that overexpression of Nanog reduces heterogeneity during ES cell maintenance. Interestingly, Nanog heterogeneity does not correlate with the heterogeneous expression of stage-specific embryonic antigen-1, suggesting that multiple but overlapping levels of heterogeneity may exist in ES cells. These findings provide insight into the factors that control ES cell self-renewal and the earliest lineage commitment to primitive endoderm while also suggesting methods to promote homogeneity during ES cell maintenance. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing potency by spontaneous fusion
Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Evans, E. P., & Smith, A. G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature729 · Cited by 1,494
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., & Rossant, J. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020 · Cited by 898
Cited by
Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity
Macfarlan, T. S., Gifford, W. D., Driscoll, S., Lettieri, K., Rowe, H. M., Bonanomi, D., Firth, A., Singer, O., Trono, D., & Pfaff, S. L. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11244 · Cited by 981
Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity
Angermueller, C., Clark, S. J., Lee, H. J., Macaulay, I. C., Teng, M. J., Hu, T. X., Krueger, F., Smallwood, S. A., Ponting, C. P., Voet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3728 · Cited by 717
Single Cell RNA-Sequencing of Pluripotent States Unlocks Modular Transcriptional Variation
Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Kim, J. K., Tsang, J. C. H., Ilicic, T., Henriksson, J., Natarajan, K. N., Tuck, A. C., Gao, X., Bühler, M., Liu, P., et al. (2015) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.011 · Cited by 570
Stock, J. K., Giadrossi, S., Casanova, M., Brookes, E., Vidal, M., Koseki, H., Brockdorff, N., Fisher, A. G., & Pombo, A. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1663 · Cited by 650
Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst
Plusa, B., Piliszek, A., Frankenberg, S., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2008) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.021519 · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, A. M., Hamazaki, T., Hankowski, K. E., & Terada, N.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2534-2542
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2023710119
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0126
- The paper
- Singh, A. M., Hamazaki, T., Hankowski, K. E., & Terada, N. (2007). A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.