Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short‐Term BMP‐2 Expression Is Sufficient for In Vivo Osteochondral Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Noël, Danièle, Gazit, Dan, Bouquet, Celine, Apparailly, Florence, Bony, Claire, Plence, Pascale, Millet, Virginie, Turgeman, Gadi, Perricaudet, Michel, Sany, Jacques, Jorgensen, Christian·2004·STEM CELLS

Abstract

Currently available murine models to evaluate mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation are based on cell injection at ectopic sites such as muscle or skin. Due to the importance of environmental factors on the differentiation capacities of stem cells in vivo, we investigated whether the peculiar synovial/cartilaginous environment may influence the lineage specificity of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2-engineered MSCs. To this aim, we used the C3H10T1/2-derived C9 MSCs that express BMP-2 under control of the doxycycline (Dox)-repressible promoter, Tet-Off, and showed in vitro, using the micropellet culture system that C9 MSCs kept their potential to differentiate toward chondrocytes. Implantation of C9 cells, either into the tibialis anterior muscles or into the joints of CB17-severe combined immunodeficient bg mice led to the formation of cartilage and bone filled with bone marrow as soon as day 10. However, no differentiation was observed after injection of naïve MSCs or C9 cells that were repressed to secrete BMP-2 by Dox addition. The BMP-2-induced differentiation of adult MSCs is thus independent of soluble factors present in the local environment of the synovial/cartilaginous tissues. Importantly, we demonstrated that a short-term expression of the BMP-2 growth factor is necessary and sufficient to irreversibly induce bone formation, suggesting that a stable genetic modification of MSCs is not required for stem cell-based bone/cartilage engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.22-1-74

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Noël, D., Gazit, D., Bouquet, C., Apparailly, F., Bony, C., Plence, P., Millet, V., Turgeman, G., Perricaudet, M., Sany, J., & Jorgensen, C.
Venue
STEM CELLS
Published
2004-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
74-85
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2104916764
Cited by
239
References
3
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short‐Term BMP‐2 Expression Is Sufficient for In Vivo Osteochondral Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.22-1-74
The paper
Noël, D., Gazit, D., Bouquet, C., Apparailly, F., Bony, C., Plence, P., Millet, V., Turgeman, G., Perricaudet, M., Sany, J., & Jorgensen, C. (2004). Short‐Term BMP‐2 Expression Is Sufficient for In Vivo Osteochondral Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. STEM CELLS. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.22-1-74

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.