The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Polymorphisms Affect Survival in Pancreatic Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose.: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) maintains genomic stability and mediates cellular response to DNA damage. We aim to demonstrate whether MMR genetic variants affect overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods.: Using the Sequenom method in genomic DNA, we retrospectively genotyped 102 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 13 MMR genes from 706 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Association between genotype and OS was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results.: At a false discovery rate of 1% (p ≤ .0015), 15 SNPs of EXO1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS2, PMS2L3, TP73, and TREX1 in patients with localized disease (n = 333) and 6 SNPs of MSH3, MSH6, and TP73 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease (n = 373) were significantly associated with OS. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, SNPs of EXO1, MSH2, MSH3, PMS2L3, and TP73 in patients with localized disease, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, and TP73 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, and EXO1, MGMT, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS2L3, and TP73 in all patients remained significant predictors for OS (p ≤ .0015) after adjusting for all clinical predictors and all SNPs with p ≤ .0015 in single-locus analysis. Sixteen haplotypes of EXO1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS2, PMS2L3, RECQL, TP73, and TREX1 significantly correlated with OS in all patients (p ≤ .001). Conclusion.: MMR gene variants may have potential value as prognostic markers for OS in pancreatic cancer patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
The implications of structured 5′ untranslated regions on translation and disease
Pickering, B. M., & Willis, A. E. (2005) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.11.006 · Cited by 339
The p53 family in differentiation and tumorigenesis
Stiewe, T. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2072 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Therapeutic Implications of Cellular Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Breast Cancer
Brooks, M. D., Burness, M. L., & Wicha, M. S. (2015) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.014 · Cited by 374
The metabolism, analysis, and targeting of steroid hormones in breast and prostate cancer
Capper, C. P., Rae, J. M., & Auchus, R. J. (2016) · Hormones and Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12672-016-0259-0 · Cited by 89
Gass, P., Lux, M. P., Rauh, C., Hein, A., Bani, M. R., Fiessler, C., Hartmann, A., Häberle, L., Pretscher, J., Erber, R., et al. (2018) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4925-1 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, X., Li, Y., Hess, K. R., Abbruzzese, J. L., & Li, D.
- Venue
- The Oncologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2098225187
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Polymorphisms Affect Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0127
- The paper
- Dong, X., Li, Y., Hess, K. R., Abbruzzese, J. L., & Li, D. (2011). DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Polymorphisms Affect Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.