The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential Impacts of Antibiotic Use in Poultry Production
Abstract
The ways in which antibiotics are used in poultry production have changed considerably during the past decade, mainly because of concerns about potential negative human health consequences caused by these uses. Human health improvements directly attributable to these antibiotic-use changes are difficult to demonstrate. Given that some antibiotics will continue to be used in the poultry industry, methods are needed for estimating the causal relationship between these antibiotic uses and actual animal and human health impacts. This is a challenging task because of the numerous factors that are able to select for the emergence, dissemination, and persistence of antibiotic resistance. Managing the potential impacts of antibiotic use in poultry requires more than a simple estimation of the risks that can be attributed to the use of antibiotics in poultry. Risk models and empirical studies that evaluate interventions that are capable of minimizing the negative consequences associated with specific antibiotic uses are desperately needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
Sampling the Antibiotic Resistome
D'Costa, V. M., McGrann, K. M., Hughes, D. W., & Wright, G. D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1120800 · Cited by 1,594
Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Population Perspective
Lipsitch, M., & Samore, M. H. (2002) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0804.010312 · Cited by 497 · cited 3×
“The probability of this transfer might increase if the individual has recently taken antibiotics (73).”
BackgroundInfluentialBager, F., Madsen, M., Christensen, J., & Aarestrup, F. M. (1997) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1 · Cited by 426 · cited 1×
“in animal agriculture can impact human health by selecting for vancomycin resistance and by aiding in the dissemination and transfer of vancomycin-resistance genes (6).”
BackgroundLevy, S. B., FitzGerald, G. B., & Macone, A. B. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197609092951103 · Cited by 352 · cited 2×
“In one of these studies, farm workers also experienced increased levels of tetracycline-resistant bacteria following the administration of in-feed tetracycline to the chickens (68,69).”
Background
Cited by
Mathew, A. G., Cissell, R., & Liamthong, S. (2007) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2006.0066 · Cited by 462
Current Perspectives of the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract and Its Microbiome
Borda-Molina, D., Seifert, J., & Camarinha-Silva, A. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.03.002 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, R. S., & Hofacre, C. L.
- Venue
- Avian Diseases
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 0005-2086 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4351
- OpenAlex
- W2133217990
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential Impacts of Antibiotic Use in Poultry Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1637/7569-033106r.1
- The paper
- Singer, R. S., & Hofacre, C. L. (2006). Potential Impacts of Antibiotic Use in Poultry Production. Avian Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1637/7569-033106r.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.